The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sure independence screening in generalized linear models with NP-dimensionality
Open accessAbstract
Ultrahigh-dimensional variable selection plays an increasingly important role in contemporary scientific discoveries and statistical research. Among others, Fan and Lv [J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 70 (2008) 849–911] propose an independent screening framework by ranking the marginal correlations. They showed that the correlation ranking procedure possesses a sure independence screening property within the context of the linear model with Gaussian covariates and responses. In this paper, we propose a more general version of the independent learning with ranking the maximum marginal likelihood estimates or the maximum marginal likelihood itself in generalized linear models. We show that the proposed methods, with Fan and Lv [J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 70 (2008) 849–911] as a very special case, also possess the sure screening property with vanishing false selection rate. The conditions under which the independence learning possesses a sure screening is surprisingly simple. This justifies the applicability of such a simple method in a wide spectrum. We quantify explicitly the extent to which the dimensionality can be reduced by independence screening, which depends on the interactions of the covariance matrix of covariates and true parameters. Simulation studies are used to illustrate the utility of the proposed approaches. In addition, we establish an exponential inequality for the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator which is useful for high-dimensional statistical learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
An Analysis of Transformations
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · Cited by 15,052
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Self-citationThe adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Probability Inequalities for sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1994) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0865-5_26 · Cited by 6,666
Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes
van der Vaart, A. W., & Wellner, J. A. (1996) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2545-2 · Cited by 5,014
Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables
Hoeffding, W. (1963) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1963.10500830 · Cited by 4,852
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
White, H. (1982) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912526 · Cited by 4,098
Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models
White, H. (1983) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912004 · Cited by 3,674
Cited by
Challenges of Big Data analysis
Fan, J., Han, F., & Liu, H. (2014) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwt032 · Cited by 1,482
Feature Screening via Distance Correlation Learning
Li, R., Zhong, W., & Zhu, L. (2012) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.695654 · Cited by 747
Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation
Fan, J., Xue, L., & Zou, H. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1198 · Cited by 313
Self-citationTuning Parameter Selection in High Dimensional Penalized Likelihood
Fan, Y., & Tang, C. Y. (2013) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12001 · Cited by 256
Estimating False Discovery Proportion Under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence
Fan, J., Han, X., & Gu, W. (2012) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2012.720478 · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., & Song, R.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2010-12-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3567-3604
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016119924
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 17.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sure independence screening in generalized linear models with NP-dimensionality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/10-aos798
- The paper
- Fan, J., & Song, R. (2010). Sure independence screening in generalized linear models with NP-dimensionality. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-aos798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.