Cited by 191Statistical Methods and InferenceGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Variable selection for sparse Dirichlet-multinomial regression with an application to microbiome data analysis

Open access
Chen, Jun, Li, Hongzhe·2013·The Annals of Applied Statistics

Abstract

With the development of next generation sequencing technology, researchers have now been able to study the microbiome composition using direct sequencing, whose output are bacterial taxa counts for each microbiome sample. One goal of microbiome study is to associate the microbiome composition with environmental covariates. We propose to model the taxa counts using a Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) regression model in order to account for overdispersion of observed counts. The DM regression model can be used for testing the association between taxa composition and covariates using the likelihood ratio test. However, when the number of the covariates is large, multiple testing can lead to loss of power. To deal with the high dimensionality of the problem, we develop a penalized likelihood approach to estimate the regression parameters and to select the variables by imposing a sparse group [Formula: see text] penalty to encourage both group-level and within-group sparsity. Such a variable selection procedure can lead to selection of the relevant covariates and their associated bacterial taxa. An efficient block-coordinate descent algorithm is developed to solve the optimization problem. We present extensive simulations to demonstrate that the sparse DM regression can result in better identification of the microbiome-associated covariates than models that ignore overdispersion or only consider the proportions. We demonstrate the power of our method in an analysis of a data set evaluating the effects of nutrient intake on human gut microbiome composition. Our results have clearly shown that the nutrient intake is strongly associated with the human gut microbiome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/12-aoas592

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the multinomial Dirichlet model and the multinomial logistic normal model can handle over-dispersed count data, but the logistic normal model also allows for both positive and negative covariation between microbial features.

    “While both the multinomial Dirichlet model and the multinomial logistic normal model can handle over-dispersed count data70,71, the logistic normal model also allows for both positive and negative covariation between microbial features69.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (2002). <i>Numerical Ecology</i>, 2nd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., & Li, H.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
The Annals of Applied Statistics
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
418-442
ISSN
  • 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7330
OpenAlex
W2124053577
Cited by
191
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (R01 CA127334)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM097505)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (UH2 DK083981)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
feature selection, microbiota composition, overdispersion, high-dimensional regression, block coordinate descent, nutrient intake, gut microbiota, multiple comparisons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review