Cited by 882Markov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsProbability and Statistical Research

Geometric Bounds for Eigenvalues of Markov Chains

Open access
Diaconis, Persi, Stroock, Daniel·1991·The Annals of Applied Probability

Abstract

We develop bounds for the second largest eigenvalue and spectral gap of a reversible Markov chain. The bounds depend on geometric quantities such as the maximum degree, diameter and covering number of associated graphs. The bounds compare well with exact answers for a variety of simple chains and seem better than bounds derived through Cheeger-like inequalities. They offer improved rates of convergence for the random walk associated to approximate computation of the permanent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aoap/1177005980

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. ALDoUs, D. (1983). Random walk on finite groups and rapidly mixing Markov chains. Séminaire de Probabilités XVII. Lecture Notes in Math. 986 243–297. Springer, New York.
  2. MIHAIL, M. (1989). Combinatorial aspects of expanders. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Computer Science, Harvard Univ.
  3. SAxL, J. (1981). On multiplicity-free permutation representations. Finite Geometrics and Designs. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 48 337–353. Cambridge Univ. Press.
  4. SENETA, E. (1981). Non-negative Matrices and Markov Chains, 2nd ed. Springer, New York. n n y () di mixing Markov chains. Inform. and Comput. 82 93–133.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diaconis, P., & Stroock, D.
Venue
The Annals of Applied Probability
Published
1991-02-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
36-61
ISSN
  • 1050-5164 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8737
OpenAlex
W2043694962
Cited by
882
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 42
FWCI
22.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Applied Probability (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
Markov chains, eigenvalue bounds, second largest eigenvalue, spectral gap, reversible Markov chains, graph diameter, covering number, Cheeger inequality, random walks, permanent computation, convergence rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review