Cited by 538Probability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods and InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

Some Problems Connected with Statistical Inference

Open access
Cox, D. R.·1958·The Annals of Mathematical Statistics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aoms/1177706618

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The problem of forking paths may be avoided altogether if researchers and their readers condition reported p values on the analytical path that is actually followed in that particular sample rather than on the two potential paths that might be followed in hypothetical replications.

    “the problem of forking paths may be avoided altogether if researchers and their readers condition reported p values on the analytical path that is actually followed in that particular sample rather than on the two potential paths that might be followed in hypothetical replications”

    From Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings? (2020) · cites this paper as Cox, 1958, p. 359-361

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1][1] F. J. AnscomBE, "Contribution to the discussion of a paper by F. N. David and N. L. Johnson" J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 18, (1956), pp. 24–27. -
  2. [2][2] F. J. AnscomBE, "Dependence of the fiducial argument on the sampling rule", Biometrika, Vol. 44 (1957), pp. 464–469. -
  3. [3][3] R. R. BAHADUR AND L. J. SAvAGE, "The non-existence of certain statistical procedures in non-parametric problems", Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 27 (1956), pp. 1115-1122. -
  4. [4][4] G. A. BArNArD, "The meaning of a significance level", Biometrika, Vol. 34 (1947), pp. 179-182. -
  5. [5][5] G. A. BARNArD, "Statistical inference", J.R. Stat. Soc., Suppl., Vol. 11 (1949), pp. 115-139. -
  6. [6][6] M. S. BARTLETT, "A note on the interpretation of quasi-sufficiency", Biometrika, Vol. 31 (1939), pp. 391–392. -
  7. [7][7] M. S. BArTLETT, "Comment on Sir Ronald Fisher's paper", J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 18 (1956), pp. 295–296. -
  8. [8][8] H. CHERNoFF, "A property of some type of A regions", Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 22 (1951), pp. 472–474. -
  9. [9][9] M. A. CREAsy, "Limits for the ratio of means", J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 16 (1954), pp. 186-194. -
  10. [10][10] R. A. FisHER, "The logic of inductive inference", J.R. Stat. Soc., Vol. 98 (1935), pp. 39-54. -
  11. [11][11] R. A. FisHER, 'Statistical methods and scientific induction", J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 17 (1955), 69–78. -
  12. [12][12] R. A. FisíER, "On a test of significance in Pearson's Biometrika Table No. 11", J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 18 (1956), pp. 56–60. -
  13. [14][14] W. HoEFFDING, '"The role of assumptions in statistical decisions", Proc. 3rd Berkeley Symp., Vol. 1 (1955), pp. 105–114. -
  14. [15][15] S. KARLIN AND H. RuBIN, "Theory of decision procedures for distributions with monotone likelihood ratio", Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 27 (1956), pp. 272–299. 16. y, a a , nn 1m. Stat. Assn. Vol. 50 (1955), pp. 946–967. -
  15. [17][17] H. JEFFREys, The theory of probability. Oxford, 2nd ed., 1946. - [19] D. V. LINDLEy, "A statistical paradox", Biometrika, Vol. 44 (1957), pp. 187-192. 19. I ss n n st mation, II, Sankhya, Vol. 15 (1955), pp. 219–236. - [20] J. G. MauLdoN, "Pivotal quantities for Wishart's and related distributions and a paradox in fiducial theory", J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 17 (1955), pp. 79–85. - [21] J. NEyMAN, "Note on an article by Sir Ronald Fisher", J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 18 (1956), pp. 288–294. - [22] J. NErmAN, "Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability", Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., A, Vol. 236 (1937), pp. 333–380. - [24] E. S. PEArsoN, "Statistical concepts in their relation to reality", J.R. Stat. Soc. B, Vol. 17 (1955), pp. 204–207. - [23] A. R. G. OwEN, "Ancillary statistics and fiducial distributions", Sankhya, Vol. 9, (1948), pp. 1–18.. - [25] J. PRzYBorowsKI AND J. WILENsKI, "Homogeneity of results in testing samples from Poisson series", Biometrika, Vol. 31 (1939), pp. 313–323. - [26] C. STEIN, "A property of some tests of composite hypotheses", Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 22 (1951), pp. 475–476. - [28] J. W. TukEy, "Some examples with fiducial relevance", Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 28 (1957), pp. 687–695. - [27] J. W. TukEy, "Fiducial inference", unpublished lectures. - [29] B. L. WELcH, "On confidence limits and sufficiency with particular reference to parameters of location", Ann. Math. Stat., Vol. 10 (1939), pp. 58–69. - [30] B. L. WELcí, "Generalisation of Student's problem", Biometrika, Vol. 34 (1947), pp. 28-35. - [31] B. L. WELcH, "Note on some criticisms made by Sir Ronald Fisher", J.R. Stat. Soc., B, Vol. 18 (1956), pp. 297–302.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, D. R.
Corresponding author
Cox, D. R.
Venue
The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
Published
1958-06
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
357-372
ISSN
0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023006322
Cited by
536
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Mathematical Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
statistical inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review