The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio
Open accessAbstract
A classical result due to Wilks [1] on the distribution of the likelihood ratio $\lambda$ is the following. Under suitable regularity conditions, if the hypothesis that a parameter $\theta$ lies on an $r$-dimensional hyperplane of $k$-dimensional space is true, the distribution of $-2 \log \lambda$ is asymptotically that of $\chi^2$ with $k - r$ degrees of freedom. In many important problems it is desired to test hypotheses which are not quite of the above type. For example, one may wish to test whether $\theta$ is on one side of a hyperplane, or to test whether $\theta$ is in the positive quadrant of a two-dimensional space. The asymptotic distribution of $-2 \log \lambda$ is examined when the value of the parameter is a boundary point of both the set of $\theta$ corresponding to the hypothesis and the set of $\theta$ corresponding to the alternative. First the case of a single observation from a multivariate normal distribution, with mean $\theta$ and known covariance matrix, is treated. The general case is then shown to reduce to this special case where the covariance matrix is replaced by the inverse of the information matrix. In particular, if one tests whether $\theta$ is on one side or the other of a smooth $(k - 1)$-dimensional surface in $k$-dimensional space and $\theta$ lies on the surface, the asymptotic distribution of $\lambda$ is that of a chance variable which is zero half the time and which behaves like $\chi^2$ with one degree of freedom the other half of the time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911963 · Cited by 5,647
Approximate likelihood-ratio test for branches: A fast, accurate, and powerful alternative
Anisimova, M., & Gascuel, O. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600755453 · Cited by 2,693
Zhang, J. (2005) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msi237 · Cited by 1,785
Distinguishing Migration From Isolation: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach
Nielsen, R., & Wakeley, J. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/158.2.885 · Cited by 1,311
The analysis of count data: a gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives.
Coxe, S., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2009) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802634175 · Cited by 1,172
Metadata
- Authors
- Chernoff, H.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1954-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 573-578
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990611835
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177728725
- The paper
- Chernoff, H. (1954). On the Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728725
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.