The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As for comparing the classifiers over multiple datasets, we followed the recommendations in Demˇ sar (2006) and used the Friedman test (Friedman, 1940) to reject the null hypothesis.”
From Deep learning for time series classification: a review (2019) · cites this paper as Friedman, 1940
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
Self-citationStatistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research.
Reed, L. J., Fisher, R. A., & Yates, F. (1944) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280633 · Cited by 3,012
Kendall, M. G., & Smith, B. B. (1939) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732186 · Cited by 992
The Correlation Ratio for Ranked Data
Wallis, W. A. (1939) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1939.10503552 · Cited by 58
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Jin, Y., Zhang, W., Wu, X. H., Liu, Y., & Hu, Z. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3120086 · Cited by 38
Liu, S., Schlesinger, J. J., McCoy, A. B., Reese, T. J., Steitz, B. D., Russo, E. M., Koh, B., & Wright, A. T. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac210 · Cited by 42
GBMOD: A granular-ball mean-shift outlier detector
Cheng, S., Su, X., Chen, B., Chen, H., Peng, D., & Yuan, Z. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.111115 · Cited by 38
Using Large Language Models for Automated Grading of Student Writing about Science
Impey, C. D., Wenger, M. C., Garuda, N., Golchin, S., & Stamer, S. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-024-00453-7 · Cited by 57
“Specifically, the Friedman Test (Friedman, 1937, 1940) was used to assess differences among graders, and Conover’s post-hoc tests (Conover, 1999; Conover, & Iman, 1979) were conducted for pairwise comparisons.”
Reputational interdependence: an examination of category reputation in higher education
Finch, D., McDonald, S., & Staple, J. (2013) · Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION · doi:10.1080/08841241.2013.810184 · Cited by 38
Tackling the supervised label ranking problem by bagging weak learners
Aledo, J. A., Gámez, J. A., & Molina, D. (2016) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2016.09.002 · Cited by 38
Abed-alguni, B. H., & Paúl, D. (2018) · Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1515/jisys-2018-0331 · Cited by 38
Nobrega, J. P., & Oliveira, A. L. I. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.070 · Cited by 37
Multi-label feature selection based on label distribution and feature complementarity
Qian, W., Long, X., Wang, Y., & Xie, Y. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106167 · Cited by 38
Classification with decision trees from a nonparametric predictive inference perspective
Abellán, J., Baker, R. M., Coolen, F. P. A., Crossman, R. J., & Masegosa, A. R. (2013) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2013.02.009 · Cited by 38
Semiochemicals from ovaries of gravid females attract ovipositing female houseflies, Musca domestica
Jiang, Y., Lei, C.-L., Niu, C.-Y., Fang, Y.-L., Chun, X., & Zhang, Z.-N. (2002) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1910(02)00162-2 · Cited by 38
Singh, P. K., Sarkar, R., & Nasipuri, M. (2016) · International Journal of Computing Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1504/ijcsm.2016.080073 · Cited by 38
Multi-label feature selection based on rough granular-ball and label distribution
Qian, W., Xu, F., Qian, J., Shu, W., & Ding, W. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119698 · Cited by 37
Intelligent crude oil price probability forecasting: Deep learning models and industry applications
Shen, L., Bao, Y., Hasan, N., Huang, Y., Zhou, X., & Deng, C. (2024) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2024.104150 · Cited by 37
Multi-objective Cuckoo Search-based Streaming Feature Selection for Multi-label Dataset
Paul, D., Kumar, R., Saha, S., & Mathew, J. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3447586 · Cited by 37
“To compare and analyze the performance of the proposed multi-label feature selection methods, we have performed two statistical tests such as Friedman test [11] and Bonferroni–Dunn test [7].”
MethodBIRCHSCAN: A sampling method for applying DBSCAN to large datasets
Ventorim, I. D. M., Luchi, D., Rodrigues, A. L., & Varejão, F. M. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115518 · Cited by 37
Memiş, S., Enginoğlu, S., & Erkan, U. (2021) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-021-06553-z · Cited by 39
“66, respectively, with 4 ( k − 1 ) degrees of freedom and the critical value for the Friedman test (Friedman 1940) given for k = 5 and N = 15 is 9 .”
MethodYeh, S.-F., Wu, M.-H., Chen, T.-Y., Lin, Y.-C., Chang, X.-J., Chiang, Y.-H., & Chang, Y.-J. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501941 · Cited by 38
“A Friedman test [25] indicated that diferences among the rankings were statistically signifcant (�2(8)=320.”
BackgroundMethodSahlaoui, H., Alaoui, E. A. A., Agoujil, S., & Nayyar, A. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12007-w · Cited by 45
Design of reject rules for ECOC classification systems
Simeone, P., Marrocco, C., & Tortorella, F. (2011) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2011.08.001 · Cited by 37
Two stage architecture for multi-label learning
Madjarov, G., Gjorgjevikj, D., & Džeroski, S. (2011) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2011.08.011 · Cited by 37
FIRE IMPACT ON A MAQUIS SOIL SEED BANK IN CABAÑEROS NATIONAL PARK (CENTRAL SPAIN)
Ferrandis, P., Herranz, J. M., & Martínez-Sánchez, J. J. (1999) · Israel Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07929978.1999.10676747 · Cited by 37
Adaptive degree penalization for link prediction
Martínez, V., Berzal, F., & Cubero, J.-C. (2015) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2015.12.003 · Cited by 37
Designing of classifiers based on immune principles and fuzzy rules
Lei, Z., & Li, R. (2007) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2007.11.019 · Cited by 37
Feature selection using binary monarch butterfly optimization
Sun, L., Si, S., Jing, Z., Xu, J., Lin, Y., & Lv, Z. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03554-9 · Cited by 36
Parallel Global Best-Worst Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for solving optimization problems
Kumar, L., Pandey, M., & Ahirwal, M. K. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110329 · Cited by 36
Semi-supervised attribute reduction based on label distribution and label irrelevance
Dai, J., Huang, W., Wang, W., & Zhang, C. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101951 · Cited by 36
A COPRAS-based Approach to Multi-Label Feature Selection for Text Classification
Mohanrasu, S. S., Janani, K., & Rakkiyappan, R. (2023) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2023.07.022 · Cited by 36
Yang, L., Zhang, S., Qin, L., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Wang, J., Xie, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.806 · Cited by 81
Multi-label feature selection based on stable label relevance and label-specific features
Yang, Y., Chen, H., Mi, Y., Luo, C., Horng, S., & Li, T. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119525 · Cited by 36
Song, Y., Lin, H., & Li, Z. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.119950 · Cited by 38
Bačanin, N., Stoean, C., Marković, D., Zivkovic, M. Z., Rashid, T. A., Chhabra, A., & Šarac, M. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18295-9 · Cited by 38
“First, the Friedman test [102] along with two-way variance analysis by ranks is used and the results are depicted in Table 8.”
Concordance coefficients to measure the agreement among several sets of ranks
Teles, J. M. V. (2012) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.681460 · Cited by 36
Integrated Rough Fuzzy Clustering for Categorical data Analysis
Saha, I., Sarkar, J. P., & Maulik, U. (2018) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/j.fss.2018.02.007 · Cited by 36
A multiobjective optimization-based sparse extreme learning machine algorithm
Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Cai, Z., & Cai, Y. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.07.060 · Cited by 36
Exploring Joint AB-LSTM With Embedded Lemmas for Adverse Drug Reaction Discovery
Santiso, S., Pérez, A., & Casillas, A. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2879744 · Cited by 36
“Finally, the Friedman test [62] was employed with 10-fold cross-validation to corroborate that the differences between the approaches explored were significant.”
MethodA parameter-free particle swarm optimization algorithm using performance classifiers
Harrison, K. R., Ombuki-Berman, B. M., & Engelbrecht, A. P. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.016 · Cited by 36
Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105606 · Cited by 36
The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?
Pacheco, D. A. D. J., Antunes, J. A. V., & de Matos, C. A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107955 · Cited by 36
Riahi-Madvar, M., Akbari, A., Nasersharif, B., & Raahemi, B. (2021) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106733 · Cited by 36
Memory-based approaches for eliminating premature convergence in particle swarm optimization
Chaitanya, K. D. V., Somayajulu, D. V. L. N., & Krishna, P. R. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-02045-z · Cited by 36
Fernández‐Navarro, F., Hervás‐Martínez, C., Gutiérrez, P. A., Peña, J. M., & Granados, F. L. (2011) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2011.03.056 · Cited by 36
Profiling instances in noise reduction
Delany, S. J., Segata, N., & Namee, B. M. (2012) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2012.01.015 · Cited by 36
Consoli, S., Darby-Dowman, K., Mladenović, N., & Pérez, J. A. M. (2008) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.014 · Cited by 36
Summarization of changes in dynamic text collections using Latent Dirichlet Allocation model
Kar, M., Nunes, S., & Ribeiro, C. (2015) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2015.06.002 · Cited by 36
Pre-extinction in sensory perconditioning.
Coppock, W. (1958) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046379 · Cited by 36
Class-specific feature selection via maximal dynamic correlation change and minimal redundancy
Xiao, M., Xu, H., & Ju, C. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120455 · Cited by 35
A Novel Flexible Inertia Weight Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm
Amoshahy, M. J., Shamsi, M., & Sedaaghi, M. H. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161558 · Cited by 35
Domingo, D., Gracia, M. T. L., Gracia, A. L. M., & de la Riva, J. (2017) · European Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/22797254.2017.1336067 · Cited by 35
“Furthermore, Friedman nonparametric test was applied in order to compare the performance of the different models (Friedman, 1940).”
MethodAutomatic feature weighting for improving financial Decision Support Systems
Serrano-Silva, Y. O., Villuendas-Rey, Y., & Yáñez-Márquéz, C. (2018) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.01.005 · Cited by 38
da Silva, L. E. B., Elnabarawy, I., & Wunsch, D. C. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.033 · Cited by 35
A novel many-objective evolutionary algorithm based on transfer matrix with Kriging model
Ma, L., Wang, R., Chen, S., Cheng, S., Wang, X., Lin, Z., Shi, Y., & Huang, M. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.030 · Cited by 35
Visual question answering via Attention-based syntactic structure tree-LSTM
Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Huang, F., Tang, X., & Li, Z. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105584 · Cited by 35
Optimal Selection of Features Using Artificial Electric Field Algorithm for Classification
Das, H., Naik, B., & Behera, H. S. (2021) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-021-05486-x · Cited by 35
An improved whale optimization algorithm for locating critical slip surface of slopes
Li, S., Luo, X., & Wu, L. (2021) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2021.103009 · Cited by 35
Multi-scale covering rough sets with applications to data classification
Huang, Z., & Li, J. (2021) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107736 · Cited by 35
Sun, L., Wang, T., Ding, W., & Xu, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2022.3222941 · Cited by 35
“To demonstrate the statistical analysis of all of these comparative algorithms for each evaluation index, the Friedman test [42] and Nemenyi test [43] were employed.”
MethodNetwork-based statistical comparison of citation topology of bibliographic databases
Šubelj, L., Fiala, D., & Bajec, M. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep06496 · Cited by 36
Negative Correlation Ensemble Learning for Ordinal Regression
Fernández‐Navarro, F., Gutiérrez, P. A., Hervás‐Martínez, C., & Yao, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2013.2268279 · Cited by 36
Wadhwa, D. R., & Malik, K. (2024) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109472 · Cited by 34
LIMFS: Label interaction-aware multi-label feature selection
Yu, Y., Li, B., Qian, J., Shu, W., & Miao, D. (2026) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2026.131177 · Cited by 34
Reitmaier, T., & Sick, B. (2015) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.06.027 · Cited by 34
Baltic Sea nutrient reductions – What should we aim for?
Ahtiainen, H., Artell, J. V., Elmgren, R., Hasselström, L., & Håkansson, C. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.016 · Cited by 34
Nonadditive similarity-based single-layer perceptron for multi-criteria collaborative filtering
Hu, Y. (2013) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.09.027 · Cited by 34
Calma, A., Reitmaier, T., & Sick, B. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.04.063 · Cited by 34
Mesquita, D. P. P., Gomes, J. P. P., Rodrigues, L. R., Oliveira, S. A. F., & Galvão, R. K. H. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.007 · Cited by 33
Beltran, J. A., Aguilera‐Mendoza, L., & Brizuela, C. A. (2018) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5030-1 · Cited by 34
“The statistical analysis of the MLAs’ performance identified (by the Friedman test) a significant difference in the BalAcc ( χ 2 f ( 3 ) = 55.2, p -value = 6.224e-12 ) of the four MLAs on multiple datasets.”
MethodInfluentialMachine learning: Modeling increment in diameter of individual trees on Atlantic Forest fragments
Júnior, I. D. S. T., Torres, C. M. M. E., Leite, H. G., de Castro, N. L. M., Soares, C. P. B., Castro, R. V. O., & Farias, A. A. (2020) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106685 · Cited by 34
Trautsch, A., Herbold, S., & Grabowski, J. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM) · doi:10.1109/icsme46990.2020.00022 · Cited by 34
“data for normality and homoscedacity and then automatically selects suitable tests for the data: repeated measures ANOVA as omnibus tests with a post-hoc Tukey HSD test [35] in case the data is normal and homoscedastic and Friedman test [36] as omnibus test with a post-hoc Nemenyi test [37] otherwise.”
MethodKAT: A Knowledge Adversarial Training Method for Zero-Order Takagi–Sugeno–Kang Fuzzy Classifiers
Qin, B., Chung, F.-L., & Wang, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2020.3034792 · Cited by 34
“The statistical results of the Friedman ranking test [37]–[39] on the testing accuracies by all the adopted methods on all the adopted datasets are reported in Tables SV and SVI in the supplementary material.”
MethodLegal information retrieval for understanding statutory terms
Šavelka, J., & Ashley, K. D. (2021) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-021-09293-5 · Cited by 37
“In Demšar (2006) the Friedman test (Friedman 1937, 1940), a non-parametric equivalent of the repeated-measures ANOVA, is recommended.”
MethodQuasi-reflection learning arithmetic optimization algorithm firefly search for feature selection
Bačanin, N., Budimirović, N., Venkatachalam, K., Jassim, H. S., Zivkovic, M. Z., Askar, S. S., & Abouhawwash, M. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15378 · Cited by 34
Involvement of 5-HT receptor subtypes in the discriminative stimulus properties of mescaline
Appel, J. B., & Callahan, P. M. (1989) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(89)90041-1 · Cited by 34
IENet: a robust convolutional neural network for EEG based brain-computer interfaces
Du, Y., & Liu, J. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac7257 · Cited by 34
Osmani, A., Bagherzadeh, J., & Gharehchopogh, F. S. (2020) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxz163 · Cited by 33
Psychas, I.-D., Marinaki, M., Marinakis, Y., & Migdalas, A. (2016) · Energy Systems · doi:10.1007/s12667-016-0209-5 · Cited by 33
Combining Mask Estimates for Single Channel Audio Source Separation Using Deep Neural Networks
Grais, E. M., Roma, G., Simpson, A. J. R., & Plumbley, M. D. (2016) · Interspeech (USB) · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2016-216 · Cited by 33
An efficient character recognition method using enhanced HOG for spam image detection
Naiemi, F., Ghods, V., & Khalesi, H. (2019) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-018-03728-z · Cited by 33
A Novel Model Based on Nonlinear Manifold Detection for Software Defect Prediction
Ghosh, S., Rana, A., & Kansal, V. (2018) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) · doi:10.1109/iccons.2018.8663026 · Cited by 33
“Friedman test belongs to the category of nonparametric statistical test [7] which is applied basically for finding out significant difference, if any among performances of various machine learning approaches associated with Nonlinear MDTs and assigning rank to them as per order.”
MethodAlzaqebah, M., Jawarneh, S., Alwohaibi, M., Alsmadi, M. K., Almarashdeh, I., & Mohammad, R. M. A. (2020) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.09.004 · Cited by 33
ALSA: Adversarial Learning of Supervised Attentions for Visual Question Answering
Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Zhao, Z., Zhang, B., Cheng, L., & Li, Z. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2020.3029423 · Cited by 33
“We employ Friedman–Nemenyi test [64] with 95% con-fidence level to analyze the difference between ALSA and the baselines.”
MethodRNN-VirSeeker: A Deep Learning Method for Identification of Short Viral Sequences From Metagenomes
Liu, F., Miao, Y., Liu, Y., & Hou, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2020.3044575 · Cited by 35
“In order to prove the significant improvement of RNNVirSeeker over the other three methods more comprehensively, Friedman test [37], [38] and Nemenyi [39] test were utilized as statistical measures, which compared the performance of multiple algorithms on multiple datasets.”
MethodIntelligent Scheduling with Reinforcement Learning
Cunha, B., Madureira, A. M., Fonseca, B., & Matos, J. E. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11083710 · Cited by 35
Hierarchical feature selection with multi-granularity clustering structure
Guo, S., Zhao, H., & Yang, W. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.04.046 · Cited by 33
Pérez, E., & Ventura, S. (2021) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06655-7 · Cited by 34
“Friedman’s test [79] was conducted in cases where a multiple comparison was carried out, Hommel’s post hoc test [80] was employed to perform a multiple comparison with a control method, Shaffer post hoc test [81] was employed to perform pairwise comparisons, and finally Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test…”
MethodÜstün, D., Toktaş, A., Erkan, U., & Akdağlı, A. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116930 · Cited by 33
Improvement and application of hybrid real-coded genetic algorithm
Song, H., Wang, J., Song, L., Zhang, H., Bei, J., Ni, J., & Ye, B. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-03048-0 · Cited by 33
A modified weighted mean of vectors optimizer for Chronic Kidney disease classification
Houssein, E. H., & Sayed, A. A. (2023) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106691 · Cited by 33
Zhang, Q., Tsang, E. C. C., He, Q., & Guo, Y. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110817 · Cited by 33
A lazy bagging approach to classification
Xingquan Zhu, A., & Yang, Y. (2008) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2008.03.008 · Cited by 33
Classification with Streaming Features: An Emerging-Pattern Mining Approach
Yu, K., Ding, W., Simovici, D. A., Wang, H., Pei, J., & Wu, X. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/2700409 · Cited by 33
Pérez, E., & Ventura, S. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102556 · Cited by 33
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., Panagiotakopoulos, T., & Kotsiantis, S. B. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-42346-0 · Cited by 38
Minimising redundancy, maximising relevance: HRV feature selection for stress classification
Ihianle, I. K., Machado, P., Owa, K., Adama, D. A., Otuka, R. I., & Lotfi, A. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122490 · Cited by 39
Lialestani, S. P. M., Duocastella, D. P., Himi, M., & Shahri, A. A. (2024) · Modeling Earth Systems and Environment · doi:10.1007/s40808-024-01992-7 · Cited by 33
“The statistical results as well as the Wilcoxon rank sum test (Wilcoxon 1945) and Friedman (Friedman 1940) also were reflected in Table 2.”
Attribute reduction of covering decision systems by hypergraph model
Chen, J., Lin, Y., Lin, G., Li, J., & Zhang, Y.-L. (2016) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.11.010 · Cited by 32
Kumar, P. K., Araki, T., Rajan, J., Saba, L., Lavra, F., Ikeda, N., Sharma, A., Shafique, S., Nicolaides, A. N., Laird, J. R., et al. (2016) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-016-1601-y · Cited by 32
Guan, H., Dai, Z., Zhao, A., & He, J. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192366 · Cited by 32
Plant Classification Using Artificial Neural Networks
Pacífico, L. D. S., Macario, V., & de Oliveira, J. F. L. (2018) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2018.8489701 · Cited by 32
Mnasri, S., Nasri, N., BOSSCHE, A. V. D., & Val, T. (2019) · ISA Transactions · doi:10.1016/j.isatra.2019.01.026 · Cited by 32
“The Friedman test [43], considered as the nonparametric equivalent of the repeated measures ANOVA test, relies on a multiple comparisons for computing the groups differences using a con-trol method.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, M.
- Corresponding author
- Friedman, Milton
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1940-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016944307
- Cited by
- 2,785
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 191 · 2025: 256 · 2024: 244 · 2023: 253 · 2022: 264 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 209 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 67
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Keywords
- tests of significance, rank tests, comparison of statistical tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review