The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As for comparing the classifiers over multiple datasets, we followed the recommendations in Demˇ sar (2006) and used the Friedman test (Friedman, 1940) to reject the null hypothesis.”
From Deep learning for time series classification: a review (2019) · cites this paper as Friedman, 1940
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
Self-citationStatistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research.
Reed, L. J., Fisher, R. A., & Yates, F. (1944) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2280633 · Cited by 3,012
Kendall, M. G., & Smith, B. B. (1939) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177732186 · Cited by 992
The Correlation Ratio for Ranked Data
Wallis, W. A. (1939) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1939.10503552 · Cited by 58
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,001
Bishop model parameter estimation in photovoltaic cells using metaheuristic optimization techniques
Restrepo-Cuestas, B. J., & Montano, J. J. R. (2024) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2024.112410 · Cited by 23
Minimizing the searching time of multiple targets in uncertain environments with multiple UAVs
Carabaza, S. P., Besada-Portas, E., & Orozco, J. A. L. (2024) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111471 · Cited by 23
Intuitionistic fuzzy generalized eigenvalue proximal support vector machine
Quadir, A., Ganaie, M. A., & Tanveer, M. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128258 · Cited by 26
“Firstly, we employ the Friedman test [8] to determine whether the models have significant di ff erences.”
MethodRecommendation using neighborhood methods with preference-relation-based similarity
Hu, Y. (2014) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.06.043 · Cited by 23
Incremental filter and wrapper approaches for feature discretization
Ferreira, A. J., & Figueiredo, M. A. T. (2013) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2012.10.036 · Cited by 23
Predicting Foreign Tourists for the Tourism Industry Using Soft Computing-Based Grey–Markov Models
Hu, Y. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9071228 · Cited by 23
“We compared outcomes for the fourteen data sets (six economies for Taiwan and eight for China) using the non-parametric Friedman test [38] with the post-hoc test, the Bonferroni–Dunn test [39].”
MethodCózar, J., de la Ossa, L., & Gámez, J. A. (2017) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.026 · Cited by 23
Cross-Version Defect Prediction using Cross-Project Defect Prediction Approaches
Amasaki, S. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3273934.3273938 · Cited by 22
“In [21, 22], they first followed a guideline by Demšar [13] that uses a Friedman test [15] with a post-hoc Nemenyi test [34] as well as Lessmann et al.”
MethodA non-canonical hybrid metaheuristic approach to adaptive data stream classification
Ghomeshi, H., Gaber, M. M., & Kovalchuk, Y. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.067 · Cited by 23
Rangel-González, J. A., Fraire-Huacuja, H. J., Frausto–Solís, J., Cruz–Reyes, L., Gomez-Santillan, C. G., Rangel-Valdez, N., & Carpio, M. (2020) · International Journal of Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1007/s40815-020-00928-4 · Cited by 23
“used, and for the evaluation of the set of the 4 algorithms the Friedman ranking [16] was used.”
MethodJoint opposite selection enhanced Mountain Gazelle Optimizer for brain stroke classification
Alomoush, W., Houssein, E. H., Alrosan, A., Abd-Alrazaq, A. A., Alweshah, M., & Alshinwan, M. (2024) · Evolutionary Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s12065-024-00917-8 · Cited by 24
“Notably, in the overall [63] is used to fairly evaluate the performance of the mMGO algorithm with the other seven competitors for the Mean and STD of the best solutions in Table 5.”
Granular ball-based fuzzy multineighborhood rough set for feature selection via label enhancement
Sun, L., Du, W., Ding, W., Qian, L., & Xu, J. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110191 · Cited by 22
Pattern classification using smallest normalized difference associative memory
Ramírez-Rubio, R., Aldape-Pérez, M., Yáñez-Márquéz, C., López-Yáñez, I., & Camacho-Nieto, O. (2017) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2017.02.013 · Cited by 22
Improving Intrusion Detection Model Prediction by Threshold Adaptation
Al-Tobi, A., & Duncan, I. (2019) · Information · doi:10.3390/info10050159 · Cited by 23
Hierarchical classification with multi-path selection based on granular computing
Guo, S., & Zhao, H. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-020-09899-2 · Cited by 22
“We conduct a non-parametric Friedman test (Friedman 1940) to systematically explore the statistical significance of the differences between the compared algorithms.”
MethodPerforming multi-target regression via gene expression programming-based ensemble models
Moyano, J. M., Reyes, Ó., Fardoun, H. M., & Ventura, S. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.060 · Cited by 22
Feature selection based on multiview entropy measures in multiperspective rough set
Xu, J., Qu, K., Meng, X., Sun, Y., & Hou, Q. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22878 · Cited by 24
Louk, M. H. L., & Tama, B. A. (2022) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc6020041 · Cited by 21
Sánchez, A., Lozano, M., Villar, P., & Herrera, F. (2009) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.20348 · Cited by 22
Ensemble probabilistic wind power forecasting with multi-scale features
Wang, Y., Chen, T., Zou, R., Song, D., Zhang, F., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2022.10.122 · Cited by 25
Two-stage species conservation for multimodal multi-objective optimization with local Pareto sets
Yang, C., Wu, T., & Ji, J. (2023) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2023.118990 · Cited by 22
Huang, D. F., Chen, Y., Liu, F., & Li, Z. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110345 · Cited by 22
Sparse feature selection via local feature and high-order label correlation
Sun, L., Ma, Y., Ding, W., & Xu, J. (2023) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-023-05136-9 · Cited by 22
Zhang, L., Lin, G., Wei, L., & Kou, Y. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10626-w · Cited by 22
“• As can be seen in Table 8, the average running time per dataset under the RMNDIS algorithm is about 1/3 of the SOSC and SMNDIS and about 1/75 that of MSFR. (Friedman 1940) was used to test the difference in classification accuracy between the new algorithm and the other algorithms.”
Li, Z., Huang, H., Huang, Q. M., & Lin, Y. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120247 · Cited by 24
Feature selection based on neighborhood complementary entropy for heterogeneous data
Dai, J., Chen, W., & Xia, L. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.121261 · Cited by 22
FECS: A Cluster Based Feature Selection Method for Software Fault Prediction with Noises
Liu, W., Liu, S., Gu, Q., Chen, X., & Chen, D. (2015) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac.2015.66 · Cited by 22
The Small Sample Nonnull Properties of Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance for Normal Populations
KRAEMER, H. C. (1976) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1976.10481536 · Cited by 22
Quantifying tropical dry forest succession in the Americas using CHRIS/PROBA
Millan, V. E. G., Sánchez-Azofeifa, A. G., Malvarez, G. C., & Rivard, B. (2014) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.010 · Cited by 22
Graph 3-coloring with a hybrid self-adaptive evolutionary algorithm
Fister, I., Mernik, M., & Filipič, B. (2012) · Computational Optimization and Applications · doi:10.1007/s10589-012-9496-5 · Cited by 22
A scalable pairwise class interaction framework for multidimensional classification
Arias, J., Gámez, J. A., Nielsen, T. D., & Puerta, J. M. (2015) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2015.07.007 · Cited by 22
García‐Jacas, C. R., Contreras‐Torres, E., Marrero‐Ponce, Y., Pupo-Meriño, M., Barigye, S. J., & Cabrera‐Leyva, L. (2016) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-016-0122-x · Cited by 22
Naik, B., Nayak, J., & Behera, H. S. (2016) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.01.001 · Cited by 22
Scene classification based on semantic labeling
Rangel, J. C., Cazorla, M., García-Varea, I., Martínez-Gómez, J., Fromont, É., & Sebban, M. (2016) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1080/01691864.2016.1164621 · Cited by 22
Lee, C.-W., & Lin, B.-Y. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10111832 · Cited by 22
Qiu, C. (2017) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems · doi:10.2991/ijcis.11.1.1 · Cited by 22
A Multiple Imputation Strategy for Eddy Covariance Data
Vitale, D., Bilancia, M., & Papale, D. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Informatics · doi:10.3808/jei.201800391 · Cited by 22
Buch, H., & Trivedi, I. N. (2019) · Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions of Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40998-019-00211-9 · Cited by 22
An improved short term load forecasting with ranker based feature selection technique
Subbiah, S. S., & Chinnappan, J. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-191568 · Cited by 22
Recent Advances in Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey and Comparative StudyPreprint
Keraghel, I., Morbieu, S., & Nadif, M. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.10825 · Cited by 144
Anomaly detection based on improved k-nearest neighbor rough sets
Chen, X., Yuan, Z., & Shan, F. (2024) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109323 · Cited by 21
Concept Drift Adaptation in Text Stream Mining Settings: A Systematic Review
Garcia, C. M., Abilio, R., Koerich, A. L., Britto, A. D. S., & Barddal, J. P. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3704922 · Cited by 28
Statistical Study of Machine Learning Algorithms Using Parametric and Non-Parametric Tests
Khadse, V. M., Mahalle, P. N., & Shinde, G. R. (2020) · International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence · doi:10.4018/ijaci.2020070105 · Cited by 21
Bidirectional loss function for Label Enhancement and distribution learning
Liu, X., Zhu, J., Zheng, Q., Li, Z., Liu, R., & Wang, J. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106690 · Cited by 21
BDF: A new decision forest algorithm
Adnan, M. N., Ip, R. H. L., Bewong, M., & Islam, M. Z. (2021) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2021.05.017 · Cited by 21
Fuzzy Monotonic K-Nearest Neighbor Versus Monotonic Fuzzy K-Nearest Neighbor
Hong, Z., Wang, X., & Wang, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2021.3117450 · Cited by 21
“Moreover, in order to test whether our proposed FMKNN has significant advantage over the other four models statistically, the results are statistically analyzed by using the Friedman test [52], [53] and its corresponding post hoc test (the Nemenyi test) [54], which can make statistical comparison of multiple classifie…”
MethodLaurin, G. V., Puletti, N., Tattoni, C., Ferrara, C., & Pirotti, F. (2021) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs13234924 · Cited by 21
Ganesan, A., & Santhanam, S. M. (2021) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101527 · Cited by 21
Panda, N., Majhi, S. K., & Pradhan, R. (2022) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-022-06564-4 · Cited by 21
“We have used Friedman’s test (Milton Friedman, 1937–1940) in this work to establish the variances among numerous considered classifiers [65, 66].”
MethodYang, Z. (2022) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03484-6 · Cited by 21
Rao algorithm based optimal Multi‐term FOPID controller for automatic voltage regulator system
Paliwal, N., Srivastava, L., & Pandit, M. (2022) · Optimal Control Applications and Methods · doi:10.1002/oca.2926 · Cited by 21
Yuan, J., & Jiao, Z. (2022) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109663 · Cited by 21
A variable precision multigranulation rough set model and attribute reduction
Chen, J., & Zhu, P. (2022) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-022-07566-y · Cited by 21
“At first, Friedman test (Friedman 1940) is employed to verify that there are significant differences among all the algorithms.”
MethodZhang, P., Yang, J., Lou, F., Wang, J., & Sun, X. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120058 · Cited by 21
M3GAN: A masking strategy with a mutable filter for multidimensional anomaly detection
Li, Y., Peng, X., Wu, Z., Yang, F., He, X., & Li, Z. (2023) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110585 · Cited by 21
Multimodal Multiobjective Differential Evolutionary Optimization With Species Conservation
Ji, J., Wu, T., & Yang, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2023.3325810 · Cited by 21
“The results are collected in Tables S-XX–S-XXII of the supplementary material and the experimental results on MMF1-MMF8 in terms of Friedman’s test ranking [56] are also given in the tables.”
ResultWang, Y., Jia, Y., Fan, S., & Xiao, J. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10697-9 · Cited by 21
Flórez‐López, R., & JERONIMO, J. M. R. (2013) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/jors.2013.119 · Cited by 21
Durán-Rosal, A. M., Gutiérrez, P. A., Carmona-Poyato, Á., & Hervás-Martínez, C. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.129 · Cited by 22
A bi-phased multi-objective genetic algorithm based classifier
Dutta, D., Sil, J., & Dutta, P. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.113163 · Cited by 21
A Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy and Feature Reduction Model for Classification
Das, H., Naik, B., & Behera, H. S. (2020) · Advances in Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1155/2020/4152049 · Cited by 21
“e critical value [64] can be obtained from Friedman statistics FF with (m − 1) and (m − 1) × (N − 1) degree of freedom.”
MethodTama, B. A., & Lim, S. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8101814 · Cited by 22
“• A non-parametric Friedman test [69] is exploited to inspect whether there exist significant differences between the classifiers with respect to the performance metrics as mentioned earlier [70].”
MethodSolving a novel multi-divisional project portfolio selection and scheduling problem
Harrison, K. R., Elsayed, S. M., Weir, T., Garanovich, I. L., Boswell, S. G., & Sarker, R. A. (2022) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104771 · Cited by 21
Orriols-Puig, A., & Casillas, J. (2010) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-010-0668-x · Cited by 21
Lin, W.-K., Lin, S., & Yang, T.-N. (2017) · Cybernetics & Systems · doi:10.1080/01969722.2017.1284533 · Cited by 21
“It can be taken as a gatekeeper that manages the flow of information in the network structure (Friedman 1940; Freeman 1979).”
BackgroundSemTra: A semi-supervised approach to traffic flow labeling with minimal human effort
Fahad, A., Almalawi, A., Tari, Z., Alharthi, K., Al‐Qahtani, F. S., & Cheriet, M. (2019) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2019.02.001 · Cited by 21
The Effect of Milking at Short Intervals with and without Injections of Oxytocin
Smith, V. R. (1947) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(47)92388-6 · Cited by 21
Iannone, E., Sellitto, G., Iaccarino, E., Ferrucci, F., Lucia, A. D., & Palomba, F. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3654443 · Cited by 29
“Both ALBERT and”
Time-dependent hydrogen fuel cell vehicle routing problem with drones and variable drone speeds
Ren, X., Fan, H., Ma, M., Fan, H., & Yue, L. (2024) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110330 · Cited by 20
Cuevas, E., Ascencio-Piña, C. R., Pérez, M., & Morales-Castañeda, B. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-67778-0 · Cited by 20
Feature selection based on rough diversity entropy
Zou, X., & Dai, J. (2025) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.112032 · Cited by 20
A comparison of statistical and decision-making techniques in marketing mix evaluation
Shokrani, M., Haghighi, M., Paricheh, M., & Shokrani, M. (2019) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-08-2018-0228 · Cited by 20
Harrison, K. R., Elsayed, S. M., Garanovich, I. L., Weir, T., Galister, M., Boswell, S. G., Taylor, R., & Sarker, R. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3086070 · Cited by 20
A Novel Ensemble Method of RVFL For Classification Problem
Malik, A. K., Ganaie, M. A., Tanveer, M., & Suganthan, P. N. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9533836 · Cited by 20
“To illustrate the statistical significance among the proposed algorithm (RoF-RVFL) and the existing algorithms (RaF, RoF and RVFL), we use Friedman test [38].”
MethodLocal rough set-based feature selection for label distribution learning with incomplete labels
Qian, W., Dong, P., Wang, Y., Dai, S., & Huang, J. (2022) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-022-01528-4 · Cited by 20
“To further verify the superiority of our algorithm compared to the other five comparison algorithms and explore the statistical significance among all algorithms, two popular statistical tests, Friedman test [64] and the Bonferroni–Dunn post-hoc test [65] are utilized in this paper, and the details are introduced as f…”
MethodGhavidel, A., Ghousi, R., & Atashi, A. (2022) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2022.2063189 · Cited by 21
“This paper uses the accuracy obtained by 10-fold cross-validation in The Friedman test, and it ranks the data of each fold together; then there are some values of ranks for each model that can lead to detecting the most effective classifiers among other models (Friedman 1940).”
MethodCourse Recommendation based on Sequences: An Evolutionary Search of Emerging Sequential Patterns
AlTwijri, M. I., Luna, J. M., Herrera, F., & Ventura, S. (2022) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-022-10015-5 · Cited by 20
“The Friedman’s test [44] has been used to analyze the general differences, whereas the Shaffer’s post hoc test [45] has been employed to perform all pairwise comparisons.”
MethodBorovits, N., Kumara, I., Nucci, D. D., Krishnan, P., Palma, S. D., Palomba, F., Tamburri, D. A., & van den Heuvel, W. (2022) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-022-10215-5 · Cited by 22
“In particular, first, we applied the Friedman test (Friedman 1940) with a significance level equal to 0.05 to reject the null hypothesis.”
MethodInfluentialNovel Chaotic Best Firefly Algorithm: COVID-19 Fake News Detection Application
Zivkovic, M. Z., Petrović, A., Venkatachalam, K., Strumberger, I., Jassim, H. S., & Bačanin, N. (2022) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09835-2_16 · Cited by 20
A no-tardiness job shop scheduling problem with overtime consideration and the solution approaches
Shi, S., Xiong, H., & Li, G. (2023) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2023.109115 · Cited by 20
Feature selection based on neighborhood rough sets and Gini index
Zhang, Y., Nie, B., Du, J., Chen, J., Du, Y., Jin, H., Zheng, X., Chen, X., & Miao, Z. (2023) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1711 · Cited by 20
“We fi rst examine whether there are signi fi cant differences among the six algorithms on these datasets, utilizing the Friedman test statistic ( Friedman, 1940 ): where r i represents the average rank of the algorithm, n denotes the number of datasets, and k represents the number of algorithms.”
MethodAbdollahpour, A., Rouhi, A., & Pira, E. (2024) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-024-05930-3 · Cited by 20
FSBOA: feature selection using bat optimization algorithm for software fault detection
Pethe, Y. S., Gourisaria, M. K., Singh, P. K., & Das, H. (2024) · Discover Internet of Things · doi:10.1007/s43926-024-00059-4 · Cited by 20
Ensembles for Predicting Structured Outputs
Kocev, D. (2012) · Informatica · Cited by 20
Adaptive error-correcting output codes
Zhong, G., & Cheriet, M. (2013) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 20
ADEMO/D: Adaptive Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Problems
Venske, S. M., Gonçalves, R. A., & Delgado, M. (2012) · Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks (SBRN) · doi:10.1109/sbrn.2012.29 · Cited by 20
Narayanan, S. J., Paramasivam, I., Bhatt, R. B., & Khalid, M. (2015) · Cybernetics and Information Technologies · doi:10.1515/cait-2015-0030 · Cited by 20
An Empirical Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Software Defect Prediction
Malhotra, R., & Raje, R. R. (2015) · International Conference on Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing Systems (BIONETICS) · doi:10.4108/icst.bict.2014.257871 · Cited by 20
Verbeke, W., Martens, D., & Baesens, B. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.042 · Cited by 20
A tree-based algorithm for attribute selection
Baranauskas, J. A., Netto, O. P., Nozawa, S. R., & Macedo, A. A. (2017) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-017-1008-y · Cited by 20
“To analyze the results, we applied the Friedman test [30] considering a confidence level of 95%; the null hypothesis assumes all algorithms have equal performance.”
MethodBioinspired Computational Approach to Missing Value Estimation
Agbehadji, I. E., Millham, R. C., Fong, S. J., & Yang, H. (2018) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2018/9457821 · Cited by 20
Guan, H., Dai, Z., Guan, S., & Zhao, A. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21050455 · Cited by 22
“For reference, Friedman’s test is a parametric statistical test that was proposed by Milton Friedman [ In the first stage, Friedman’s test requires comparison of the average ranking of different algorithms , where, j i r is the rank of the j -th of k algorithms on the i -th of N datasets.”
MethodInter-node Hellinger Distance based Decision Tree
Akash, P. S., Kadir, M. E., Ali, A. A., & Shoyaib, M. (2019) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/272 · Cited by 20
A Novel Hybrid Approach for Chronic Disease Classification
Jain, D. K., & Singh, V. P. (2019) · International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics · doi:10.4018/ijhisi.2020010101 · Cited by 21
Sharma, H., & Jalal, A. S. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116159 · Cited by 21
A novel attributed community detection by integration of feature weighting and node centrality
Rostami, M., & Oussalah, M. (2022) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100219 · Cited by 19
Colour preferences in the pigeon: A behavioural and psychopharmacological study
Sahgal, A., & Iversen, S. D. (1975) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf00421021 · Cited by 20
Extended tables of the distribution of friedman’ s s-statistic in the two-way layout
Odeh, R. E. (1977) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610917708812025 · Cited by 20
Chen, J., Zhang, X., & Yuan, Z. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110837 · Cited by 19
Active semi-supervised transfer learning (ASTL) for offline BCI calibration
Wu, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) · doi:10.1109/smc.2017.8122610 · Cited by 16
“We used Friedman’s test [9], a two-way non-parametric ANOVA where column effects are tested for significant differences after adjusting for possible row effects.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, M.
- Corresponding author
- Friedman, Milton
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1940-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 86-92
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016944307
- Cited by
- 2,785
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 191 · 2025: 256 · 2024: 244 · 2023: 253 · 2022: 264 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 209 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 67
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics (publishedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Keywords
- tests of significance, rank tests, comparison of statistical tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review