The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A General Theory for Jackknife Variance Estimation
Open accessAbstract
The delete-1 jackknife is known to give inconsistent variance estimators for nonsmooth estimators such as the sample quantiles. This well-known deficiency can be rectified by using a more general jackknife with $d$, the number of observations deleted, depending on a smoothness measure of the point estimator. Our general theory explains why jackknife works or fails. It also shows that (i) for "sufficiently smooth" estimators, the jackknife variance estimators with bounded $d$ are consistent and asymptotically unbiased and (ii) for "nonsmooth" estimators, $d$ has to go to infinity at a rate explicitly determined by a smoothness measure to ensure consistency and asymptotic unbiasedness. Improved results are obtained for several classes of estimators. In particular, for the sample $p$-quantiles, the jackknife variance estimators with $d$ satisfying $n^{1/2}/d \rightarrow 0$ and $n - d \rightarrow \infty$ are consistent and asymptotically unbiased.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
Cited by
Linear Model Selection by Cross-validation
Shao, J. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476299 · Cited by 1,790
Self-citationModel Selection Via Multifold Cross Validation
Zhang, P. (1993) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176349027 · Cited by 539
Demontis, D., Walters, R. K., Rajagopal, V. M., Waldman, I. D., Grove, J., Als, T. D., Dalsgaard, S., Ribasés, M., Bybjerg-Grauholm, J., Bækvad-Hansen, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20443-2 · Cited by 50
Using i.i.d. bootstrap inference for general non-i.i.d. models
Liu, R. Y., & Singh, K. (1995) · Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference · doi:10.1016/0378-3758(94)00008-j · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, J., & Wu, C. F. J.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1989-09-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984347506
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.