Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A General Theory for Jackknife Variance Estimation

Open access
Shao, Jun, Wu, C. F. J.·1989·The Annals of Statistics

Abstract

The delete-1 jackknife is known to give inconsistent variance estimators for nonsmooth estimators such as the sample quantiles. This well-known deficiency can be rectified by using a more general jackknife with $d$, the number of observations deleted, depending on a smoothness measure of the point estimator. Our general theory explains why jackknife works or fails. It also shows that (i) for "sufficiently smooth" estimators, the jackknife variance estimators with bounded $d$ are consistent and asymptotically unbiased and (ii) for "nonsmooth" estimators, $d$ has to go to infinity at a rate explicitly determined by a smoothness measure to ensure consistency and asymptotic unbiasedness. Improved results are obtained for several classes of estimators. In particular, for the sample $p$-quantiles, the jackknife variance estimators with $d$ satisfying $n^{1/2}/d \rightarrow 0$ and $n - d \rightarrow \infty$ are consistent and asymptotically unbiased.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aos/1176347263

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Shao, J., & Wu, C. F. J.
Venue
The Annals of Statistics
Published
1989-09-01
Volume
17
Issue
3
ISSN
0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984347506
Cited by
306
References
2
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.