The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why Least Squares and Maximum Entropy? An Axiomatic Approach to Inference for Linear Inverse Problems
Open accessAbstract
An attempt is made to determine the logically consistent rules for selecting a vector from any feasible set defined by linear constraints, when either all $n$-vectors or those with positive components or the probability vectors are permissible. Some basic postulates are satisfied if and only if the selection rule is to minimize a certain function which, if a "prior guess" is available, is a measure of distance from the prior guess. Two further natural postulates restrict the permissible distances to the author's $f$-divergences and Bregman's divergences, respectively. As corollaries, axiomatic characterizations of the methods of least squares and minimum discrimination information are arrived at. Alternatively, the latter are also characterized by a postulate of composition consistency. As a special case, a derivation of the method of maximum entropy from a small set of natural axioms is obtained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Cited by
Logistic Regression, AdaBoost and Bregman Distances
Collins, M., Schapire, R. E., & Singer, Y. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1013912006537 · Cited by 687
Game theory, maximum entropy, minimum discrepancy and robust Bayesian decision theory
Grünwald, P. D., & Dawid, A. P. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000553 · Cited by 454
Information Theory and Statistics: A Tutorial
Csiszár, I., & Shields, P. C. (2004) · Foundations and Trends™ in Communications and Information Theory · doi:10.1561/0100000004 · Cited by 420
A scaled gradient projection method for constrained image deblurring
Bonettini, S., Zanella, R., & Zanni, L. (2009) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/25/1/015002 · Cited by 254
Measuring the complexity of the law: the United States Code
Katz, D. M., & Bommarito, M. J. (2014) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-014-9160-8 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Csiszar, I.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1991-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155969596
- Cited by
- 790
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Least Squares and Maximum Entropy? An Axiomatic Approach to Inference for Linear Inverse Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1176348385
- The paper
- Csiszar, I. (1991). Why Least Squares and Maximum Entropy? An Axiomatic Approach to Inference for Linear Inverse Problems. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176348385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.