Cited by 96

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intersecting Variables and Perceived Sexual Orientation in Men

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn·2011·American Speech

Abstract

Sociolinguistic styles tie linguistic resources together into clusters and link them to social contexts of times, groups, places, and activities. Perceptions of masculinity and sexual orientation represent a well-studied area on sociolinguistic perception, offering many variables with potentially relevant social meanings. This study examines social perceptions of guises created by intersecting three masculinity-relevant variables: pitch, /s/-fronting or backing, and (ING). First, 110 online respondents provided descriptions and naturalness ratings of speech samples that were digitially modified to include the different variants; next, 175 respondents rated the speakers on six-point scales based on the terms “smart,” “knowledgeable,” “masculine,” “gay,” “friendly,” “laid-back,” “country,” “educated,” and “confident.” The results showed that /s/-fronting carries strong social meaning across multiple speakers and other linguistic cues, making speakers sound less masculine, more gay and less competent. As documented elsewhere, use of the (ING) variants -ing and -in made speakers sound more or less competent, respectively. The combination of /s/-fronting and (ING), and, independently, /s/-backing, showed more complex effects, shifting relationships between multiple percepts. Taken together, these results provide some support for style-based sociolinguistic models, but also underline the need for more sophisticated statistical treatments of covariation in social perception.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00031283-1277510

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Agha, 2003, The Social Life of Cultural Value, Language and Communication, 23, 231, 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 · DOI
  2. Campbell-Kibler, 2007, Accent, (ING), and the Social Logic of Listener Perceptions, American Speech, 82, 32, 10.1215/00031283-2007-002 · DOI
  3. 2008, I’ll Be the Judge of That: Diversity in Social Perceptions of (ING), Language in Society, 37, 637, 10.1017/S0047404508080974 · DOI
  4. 2009, The Nature of Sociolinguistic Perception, Language Variation and Change, 21, 135, 10.1017/S0954394509000052 · DOI
  5. Campbell-Kibler Kathryn Eckert Penelope Mendoza-Denton Norma Moore Emma (Half Moon Bay Style Collective). 2006. “The Elements of Style.” Poster presented at the 35th annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV 35), Columbus, Ohio, Nov. 9–12. Available at http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~kbck/HMB_poster.pdf.
  6. Connell, 1995, Masculinities
  7. Coupland, 2007, Style: Language Variation and Identity, 10.1017/CBO9780511755064 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Crist, 1997, “Duration of Onset Consonants in Gay Male Stereotyped Speech.” In “Current Work in Linguistics,”, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4.3, 53
  9. Eckert, 2008, Variation and the Indexical Field, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453, 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Fischer, 1958, Social Influence of a Linguistic Variant, Word, 14, 47, 10.1080/00437956.1958.11659655 · DOI
  11. Gaudio, Sounding Gay: Pitch Properties in the Speech of Gay and Straight Men, American Speech, 69, 1994
  12. Hebdige, 1979, Subculture: The Meaning of Style
  13. Kiesling, 1998, Men’s Identities and Sociolinguistic Variation: The Case of Fraternity Men, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2, 69, 10.1111/1467-9481.00031 · DOI
  14. Kulick, 2000, Gay and Lesbian Language, Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 243, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.243 · DOI
  15. Labov, 1966, The Social Stratification of English in New York City
  16. 1972, Sociolinguistic Patterns
  17. Labov, 2006, “Listeners’ Sensitivity to the Frequency of Sociolinguistic Variables.” In “Papers from NWAV 34,”, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 12.2, 105
  18. Levon, 2007, Sexuality in Context: Variation and the Sociolinguistic Perception of Identity, Language in Society, 36, 533, 10.1017/S0047404507070431 · DOI
  19. Linville, 1998, Acoustic Correlates of Perceived versus Actual Sexual Orientation in Men’s Speech, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50, 35, 10.1159/000021447 · DOI
  20. Munson, 2010, Variation, Implied Pathology, Social Meaning, and the ‘Gay Lisp’: A Response tO Van Borsel et al. (2009), Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 1, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.07.002 · DOI
  21. Pierrehumbert, 2004, The Influence of Sexual Orientation on Vowel Production, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 116, 1905, 10.1121/1.1788729 · DOI
  22. Podesva, 2001, Sharing Resources and Indexing Meanings in the Production of Gay Styles, 175
  23. R Development Core Team, 2007, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
  24. Sachs, 1975, Cues to Identification of Sex in Children’s Speech, 152
  25. Smyth, 2003, Male Voices and Perceived Sexual Orientation: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach, Language in Society, 32, 329, 10.1017/S0047404503323024 · DOI
  26. Stuart-Smith, 2007, Empirical Evidence for Gendered Speech Production: /s/ in Glaswegian, 65
  27. Trudgill, 1974, The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  28. Van Borsel, 2009, The Prevalence of Lisping in Gay Men, Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 100, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.08.004 · DOI
  29. Zahn, 1985, Measuring Language Attitudes: The Speech Evaluation Instrument, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 113, 10.1177/0261927X8500400203 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Campbell-Kibler, K.
Venue
American Speech
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
52-68
ISSN
  • 0003-1283
  • 1527-2133
Cited by
96
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review