The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intersecting Variables and Perceived Sexual Orientation in Men
Abstract
Sociolinguistic styles tie linguistic resources together into clusters and link them to social contexts of times, groups, places, and activities. Perceptions of masculinity and sexual orientation represent a well-studied area on sociolinguistic perception, offering many variables with potentially relevant social meanings. This study examines social perceptions of guises created by intersecting three masculinity-relevant variables: pitch, /s/-fronting or backing, and (ING). First, 110 online respondents provided descriptions and naturalness ratings of speech samples that were digitially modified to include the different variants; next, 175 respondents rated the speakers on six-point scales based on the terms “smart,” “knowledgeable,” “masculine,” “gay,” “friendly,” “laid-back,” “country,” “educated,” and “confident.” The results showed that /s/-fronting carries strong social meaning across multiple speakers and other linguistic cues, making speakers sound less masculine, more gay and less competent. As documented elsewhere, use of the (ING) variants -ing and -in made speakers sound more or less competent, respectively. The combination of /s/-fronting and (ING), and, independently, /s/-backing, showed more complex effects, shifting relationships between multiple percepts. Taken together, these results provide some support for style-based sociolinguistic models, but also underline the need for more sophisticated statistical treatments of covariation in social perception.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More specifically, it has been shown that social evaluations linked to variable (ING) can depend on the copresence of other socially meaningful linguistic variables (Campbell-Kibler, 2011).”
From Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable (2023) · cites this paper as Campbell-Kibler, 2011
Citations
Cites
Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801686 · Cited by 3,253
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Agha, 2003, The Social Life of Cultural Value, Language and Communication, 23, 231, 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 · DOI
- Campbell-Kibler, 2007, Accent, (ING), and the Social Logic of Listener Perceptions, American Speech, 82, 32, 10.1215/00031283-2007-002 · DOI
- 2008, I’ll Be the Judge of That: Diversity in Social Perceptions of (ING), Language in Society, 37, 637, 10.1017/S0047404508080974 · DOI
- 2009, The Nature of Sociolinguistic Perception, Language Variation and Change, 21, 135, 10.1017/S0954394509000052 · DOI
- Campbell-Kibler Kathryn Eckert Penelope Mendoza-Denton Norma Moore Emma (Half Moon Bay Style Collective). 2006. “The Elements of Style.” Poster presented at the 35th annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV 35), Columbus, Ohio, Nov. 9–12. Available at http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~kbck/HMB_poster.pdf.
- Connell, 1995, Masculinities
- Coupland, 2007, Style: Language Variation and Identity, 10.1017/CBO9780511755064 · DOI · Paper page
- Crist, 1997, “Duration of Onset Consonants in Gay Male Stereotyped Speech.” In “Current Work in Linguistics,”, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4.3, 53
- Eckert, 2008, Variation and the Indexical Field, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453, 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x · DOI · Paper page
- Fischer, 1958, Social Influence of a Linguistic Variant, Word, 14, 47, 10.1080/00437956.1958.11659655 · DOI
- Gaudio, Sounding Gay: Pitch Properties in the Speech of Gay and Straight Men, American Speech, 69, 1994
- Hebdige, 1979, Subculture: The Meaning of Style
- Kiesling, 1998, Men’s Identities and Sociolinguistic Variation: The Case of Fraternity Men, Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2, 69, 10.1111/1467-9481.00031 · DOI
- Kulick, 2000, Gay and Lesbian Language, Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 243, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.243 · DOI
- Labov, 1966, The Social Stratification of English in New York City
- 1972, Sociolinguistic Patterns
- Labov, 2006, “Listeners’ Sensitivity to the Frequency of Sociolinguistic Variables.” In “Papers from NWAV 34,”, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 12.2, 105
- Levon, 2007, Sexuality in Context: Variation and the Sociolinguistic Perception of Identity, Language in Society, 36, 533, 10.1017/S0047404507070431 · DOI
- Linville, 1998, Acoustic Correlates of Perceived versus Actual Sexual Orientation in Men’s Speech, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 50, 35, 10.1159/000021447 · DOI
- Munson, 2010, Variation, Implied Pathology, Social Meaning, and the ‘Gay Lisp’: A Response tO Van Borsel et al. (2009), Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 1, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.07.002 · DOI
- Pierrehumbert, 2004, The Influence of Sexual Orientation on Vowel Production, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 116, 1905, 10.1121/1.1788729 · DOI
- Podesva, 2001, Sharing Resources and Indexing Meanings in the Production of Gay Styles, 175
- R Development Core Team, 2007, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
- Sachs, 1975, Cues to Identification of Sex in Children’s Speech, 152
- Smyth, 2003, Male Voices and Perceived Sexual Orientation: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach, Language in Society, 32, 329, 10.1017/S0047404503323024 · DOI
- Stuart-Smith, 2007, Empirical Evidence for Gendered Speech Production: /s/ in Glaswegian, 65
- Trudgill, 1974, The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
- Van Borsel, 2009, The Prevalence of Lisping in Gay Men, Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 100, 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.08.004 · DOI
- Zahn, 1985, Measuring Language Attitudes: The Speech Evaluation Instrument, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 113, 10.1177/0261927X8500400203 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whose gendered voices matter?: Race and gender in the articulation of /s/ in Bakersfield, California
Calder, J., & King, S. (2022) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12584 · Cited by 26
Swear(ING) ain't play(ING): The interaction of taboo language and the sociolinguistic variable
Hunt, M., Cotter, C., Pearson, H., & Stockall, L. (2023) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12588 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell-Kibler, K.
- Venue
- American Speech
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-68
- ISSN
- 0003-1283
- 1527-2133
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review