The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality
Abstract
Research Article| July 01 2000 The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality Dana K. Nelkin Dana K. Nelkin Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (3): 373–408. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-3-373 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Twitter Permissions Search Site Citation Dana K. Nelkin; The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality. The Philosophical Review 1 July 2000; 109 (3): 373–408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-3-373 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsThe Philosophical Review Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Cornell University2000 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wedgwood, R. (2002) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.10 · Cited by 279
Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law
Littlejohn, C. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1608-4 · Cited by 95
Knowledge, justification, and (a sort of) safe belief
Whiting, D. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01905-z · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Nelkin, D. K.
- Venue
- The Philosophical Review
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-408
- ISSN
- 0031-8108 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1470
- OpenAlex
- W2108583517
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/00318108-109-3-373
- The paper
- Nelkin, D. K. (2000). The Lottery Paradox, Knowledge, and Rationality. The Philosophical Review. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-3-373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
