Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 69Chinese history and philosophyTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesAnthropological Studies and Insights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Did Chinese Medicine Become Experiential? The Political Epistemology of Jingyan

Lei, Sean Hsiang-lin·2002·positions: asia critique

Abstract

Research Article| May 01 2002 How Did Chinese Medicine Become Experiential? The Political Epistemology of Jingyan Sean Hsiang-lin Lei Sean Hsiang-lin Lei Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google positions (2002) 10 (2): 333–364. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-10-2-333 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Sean Hsiang-lin Lei; How Did Chinese Medicine Become Experiential? The Political Epistemology of Jingyan. positions 1 May 2002; 10 (2): 333–364. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-10-2-333 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll Journalspositions Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. 2002 by Duke University Press2002 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/10679847-10-2-333

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Metadata

Authors
Lei, S. H.-L.
Corresponding author
Lei, Sean Hsiang-lin
Venue
positions: asia critique
Published
2002-05-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
333-364
ISSN
  • 1067-9847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-8271
OpenAlex
W2139649712
Cited by
69
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • positions asia critique (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
traditional Chinese medicine, experiential knowledge, political epistemology, medical knowledge production, epistemic authority

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.