The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination
Abstract
Imperial Debris redirects critical focus from ruins as evidence of the past to as the processes through which imperial power occupies the present. Ann Laura Stoler's introduction is a manifesto, a compelling call for postcolonial studies to expand its analytical scope to address the toxic but less perceptible corrosions and violent accruals of colonial aftermaths, as well as their durable traces on the material environment and people's bodies and minds. In their provocative, tightly focused responses to Stoler, the contributors explore subjects as seemingly diverse as villages submerged during the building of a massive dam in southern India, Palestinian children taught to envision and document ancestral homes razed by the Israeli military, and survival on the toxic edges of oil refineries and amid the remains of apartheid in Durban, South Africa. They consider the significance of Cold War imagery of a United States decimated by nuclear blast, perceptions of a swath of Argentina's Gran Chaco as a barbarous void, and the enduring resonance, in contemporary sexual violence, of atrocities in King Leopold's Congo. Reflecting on the physical destruction of Sri Lanka, on Detroit as a colonial metropole in relation to sites of ruination in the Amazon, and on interactions near a UNESCO World Heritage Site in the Brazilian state of Bahia, the contributors attend to present-day harms in the occluded, unexpected sites and situations where earlier imperial formations persist. Contributors . Ariella Azoulay, John F. Collins, Sharad Chari, E. Valentine Daniel, Gaston Gordillo, Greg Grandin, Nancy Rose Hunt, Joseph Masco, Vyjayanthi Venuturupalli Rao, Ann Laura Stoler
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Subprime Empire: On the In-Betweenness of Finance
Schuster, C., & Kar, S. (2021) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/716066 · Cited by 36
Van Dexter, K., & Visseren-Hamakers, I. (2020) · Journal of Land Use Science · doi:10.1080/1747423x.2019.1699614 · Cited by 30
Social geographies, the practice of marronage and the archaeology of absence in colonial Mexico
Amaral, A. (2017) · Archaeological Dialogues · doi:10.1017/s1380203817000228 · Cited by 11
Community and the Contours of Empire: The Hacienda System in the Northern Highlands of Ecuador
Cossin, Z. A. (2019) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-018-0488-8 · Cited by 5
Ruínas circulares : vida e história no norte do Haiti
Charafeddine Bulamah, R. (2026) · doi:10.70675/a4b36658z47daz4e34z9766z2e85e6ac50e2
Metadata
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2013
- OpenAlex
- W637145156
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.53
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/9780822395850
- The paper
- Imperial Debris: On Ruins and Ruination. (2013). Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395850
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.