Cited by 5Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesArchaeology and Cultural HeritageLatin American history and culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community and the Contours of Empire: The Hacienda System in the Northern Highlands of Ecuador

Cossin, Zev A.·2019·International Journal of Historical Archaeology

Abstract

Relationships between humans and material goods are key in the emergences of social identity and status under imperial projects. I argue that a critical focus on the concept of “community” provides a salient frame by which to assess status and identity and that everyday materiality is a key mechanism by which such collective forms of identity are forged. I draw on historical documents, oral histories, and archaeological evidence of a late nineteenth-century indigenous hacienda laborer household from Hacienda Guachalá, highlands of Ecuador, and show that status and identity may be generated through what you do rather than what you own.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10761-018-0488-8

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Becker, M. and Tutillo, S. (2009). Historia Agraria y Social de Cayambe. FLACSO, Quito.
  2. Chancay Vásquez, J. V. (2004). Mayólicas en Santiago de Guayaquil Colonial Temprano (1547–1690). Licenciatura Thesis, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador.
  3. Favre, H. (1976). Evolución y situación de la hacienda tradicional de la región de Huancavelica. In Matos Mar, J. (ed.), Hacienda, comunidad y campesinado en el Peru, 2d ed. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima, pp. 105–138.
  4. Gonzalez, A. L. (2010). Temper Variability of the Early to Late Intermediate Period Pottery of the Pambamarca Region in the Northern Andes of Ecuador. Master's thesis, University of Hawaii.
  5. Leone, M. P. and Knauf, J. E. (eds.) (2015). Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
  6. Moreno Yánez, S. E. (2008). El estado Inca. In Ayala Mora, E. (ed.), Manual de Historia del Ecuador. Universidad Andina Simon Bolivar, Quito, pp. 33–40.
  7. Weismantel, M. J. (1989). Making breakfast and raising babies: the Zumbagua household as constituted process. In Wilk, R. R. (ed.), The Household Economy: Reconsidering the Domestic Mode of Production. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 55–72.

Metadata

Authors
Cossin, Z. A.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Cossin, Zev A.
Venue
International Journal of Historical Archaeology
Published
2019-01-03
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
1039-1062
ISSN
  • 1092-7697 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7748
OpenAlex
W2618055779
Cited by
5
References
92
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
  • The 81st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
Keywords
community, empire, hacienda system, social status, social identity, materiality, 19th century, colonial Ecuador

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review