Cited by 15Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationCultural Studies and Postmodernism

Metaphors of Visibility: Rhetorical Practices in the Normalization of Individual Online Image Management

Draper, Nora A.·2020·American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract

Online image management has become a routine component of contemporary self-presentation. While popular media have concentrated on covering issues related to privacy, individuals in a social environment that prizes visibility face a more implicit mandate to balance concerns about overexposure against the perceived dangers of invisibility. A new class of promotional intermediaries, those that sell personal online reputation management services, have emerged to help individuals navigate the inevitability of “being seen” online with the urgency of image management. These companies apply strategies familiar in advertising and public relations to online self-presentation. This article explores how industry efforts to sell image management as an individual imperative draw on metaphors—including digital tattoo, digital footprint, and digital doppelgänger—to foster anxieties about how our digital identities are constructed, encountered, and interpreted. It argues these metaphors, which warn of the dangers of both visibility and invisibility, reveal a tension that informs popular discourse around digital self-presentation. Ultimately, this article considers how “strategic transparency” is offered to assuage fears, thereby generating a market for personal image management services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002764220945354

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Draper, N. A.
Affiliations
University of New Hampshire (US)
Corresponding author
Draper, Nora A.
Venue
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2020-09-23
Volume
64
Issue
11
Pages
1627-1645
ISSN
  • 0002-7642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3381
OpenAlex
W3088107892
Cited by
15
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Behavioral Scientist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
Keywords
online self-presentation, online reputation management, digital identity, visibility, invisibility, digital footprint, digital doppelgängers, metaphor, strategic transparency, privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review