Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Platform design and algorithmic decision-making also produce biases of their own.
“Apart from users’ biases, platform design and algorithmic decision-making also produce biases of their own (Amoore, 2020, 74–75).”
From Trust and power in Airbnb's digital rating and reputation system (2025) · cites this paper as Amoore, 2020
Critical algorithm studies emphasize that such systems operate as cultural and institutional mediators rather than neutral instruments.
“Critical algorithm studies emphasize that such systems operate as cultural and institutional mediators rather than neutral instruments [2,14].”
From Who speaks when machines read scripture: boundary-making and interpretive authority in AI-mediated religious knowledge (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epistemic injustice and data science technologies
Symons, J., & Alvarado, R. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03631-z · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Trust and power in Airbnb's digital rating and reputation system
Christiaens, T. (2025) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-025-09825-6 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Apart from users’ biases, platform design and algorithmic decision-making also produce biases of their own (Amoore, 2020, 74–75).”
Ahmad, H., & Ghafar, N. A. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01254-5 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amoore, L.
- Corresponding author
- Amoore, Louise
- ORCID
- Amoore, Louise
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2020
- OpenAlex
- W4250469005
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- cloud computing, ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
