The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury in Adult Rats with Intravenous Administration of Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of bone marrow stromal cells administered intravenously to female rats subjected to traumatic brain injury. METHODS: We injected marrow stromal cells harvested from male rat bone marrow (n = 24) into the tail vein of the female rat (n = 8) 24 hours after traumatic brain injury; the rats were killed at Day 7 or 14 after treatment. The neurological function of the rats was evaluated using the rotarod test and the neurological severity score. The distribution of the male donor cells in brain, heart, lung, kidney, liver, muscle, spleen, and bone marrow of the female recipient rats was measured by identifying Y chromosome-positive cells using fluorescent in situ hybridization. RESULTS: We found that marrow stromal cells injected intravenously significantly reduced motor and neurological deficits compared with control groups by Day 15 after traumatic brain injury (P < 0.05, analysis of covariance for repeated measures). The transplanted cells preferentially engrafted into the parenchyma of the injured brain and expressed the neuronal marker NeuN and the astrocytic marker glial fibrillary acidic protein. Marrow stromal cells were also found in other organs in female rats subjected to traumatic brain injury without any obvious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the intravenous administration of marrow stromal cells may be a promising therapeutic strategy that warrants further investigation for patients with traumatic brain injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perivascular microglial cells of the CNS are bone marrow-derived and present antigen in vivo
Hickey, W. F., & Kimura, H. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3276004 · Cited by 1,466
A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat
Edward Dixon, C., Clifton, G. L., Lighthall, J. W., Yaghmai, A. A., & Hayes, R. L. (1991) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(91)90104-8 · Cited by 1,141
Cited by
Chamberlain, G., Fox, J., Ashton, B., & Middleton, J. (2007) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197 · Cited by 2,381
Zhang, Y., Chopp, M., Meng, Y., Katakowski, M., Xin, H., Mahmood, A., & Xiong, Y. (2015) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.11.jns14770 · Cited by 737
Self-citationTransplanted bone marrow generates new neurons in human brains
Mezey, É., Key, S., Vogelsang, G., Szalayova, I., Lange, G. D., & Crain, B. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0336479100 · Cited by 567
Endometrial cells derived from donor stem cells in bone marrow transplant recipients
Taylor, H. S. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.292.1.81 · Cited by 510
VEGF expression by mesenchymal stem cells contributes to angiogenesis in pancreatic carcinoma
Beckermann, B. M., Kallifatidis, G., Groth, A., Frommhold, D., Apel, A., Mattern, J., Salnikov, A. V., Moldenhauer, G., Wagner, W., Diehlmann, A., et al. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604508 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahmood, A., Lu, D., Lu, M., & Chopp, M.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 697-703
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4040
- OpenAlex
- W2089738396
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury in Adult Rats with Intravenous Administration of Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1227/01.neu.0000079333.61863.aa
- The paper
- Mahmood, A., Lu, D., Lu, M., & Chopp, M. (2003). Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury in Adult Rats with Intravenous Administration of Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000079333.61863.aa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.