Cited by 510Mesenchymal stem cell researchReproductive System and PregnancyHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Endometrial cells derived from donor stem cells in bone marrow transplant recipients

Open access
Taylor, Hugh S.·2004·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Regeneration of the endometrium in each menstrual cycle is required for reproduction. Endogenous endometrial stem cells reside in the basalis layer and serve as a source of cells that differentiate to form the endometrium. Bone marrow-derived cells have been shown to take on functions outside the hematopoietic system. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possibility that cells of extrauterine origin could repopulate the endometrium. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Endometrium from 4 HLA-mismatched bone marrow transplant recipients (1998-2002) was evaluated for donor HLA expression. Each recipient had a bone marrow donor with an HLA type that enabled determination of the origin of any cell. Endometrial biopsies also were obtained from 4 healthy control women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: HLA type was determined by immunohistochemistry and by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Donor-derived endometrial cells were detected in endometrial biopsy samples from all bone marrow recipients and accounted for 0.2% to 48% of epithelial cells and 0.3% to 52% of stromal cells. None of the controls demonstrated HLA mismatch in endometrial samples. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that endometrial cells can originate from donor-derived bone marrow cells and suggest that nonuterine stem cells contribute to the regeneration of endometrial tissue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.292.1.81

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endometrial biopsy of HLA-mismatched bone marrow donor recipients demonstrated donor-derived cells in the stroma and the epithelium.

    “Endometrial biopsy of HLA-mismatched bone marrow donor recipients demonstrated donor-derived cells in the stroma and the epithelium (Taylor, 2004;Ikoma et al., 2009).”

    From Endometriosis and nuclear receptors (2019) · cites this paper as Taylor, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Kumar S, Zhu LJ, Polihronis M, et al. Progester- one induces calcitonin gene expression in human en- dometrium within the putative window of implanta- tion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:4443-4450.
  2. Unger JB, Meeks GR. Hysterectomy after endo- metrial ablation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175: 1432-1437.
  3. Sampson JA. Peritoneal endometriosis due to the menstrual dissemination or endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1927;14: 422-429.
  4. Vinatier D, Orazi G, Cosson M, Dufour P. Theo- ries of endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;96:21-34.
  5. Rier SE, Yeaman GR. Immune aspects of endome- triosis: relevance of the uterine mucosal immune sys- tem. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1997;15:209-220.
  6. Braun DP, Dmowski WP. Endometriosis: abnor- mal endometrium and dysfunctional immune re- sponse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;10:365- 369.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, H. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Hugh S.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2004-07-07
Volume
292
Issue
1
Pages
81
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2048412962
Cited by
510
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 25
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES10610, R01ES010610)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD36887)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
endometrium, endometrial regeneration, bone marrow-derived cells, donor-derived cells, HLA mismatch, bone marrow transplantation, endometrial stem cells, endometrial epithelium, endometrial stroma, cell of origin
MeSH terms
Adult, Cell Differentiation, Endometrium, Epithelial Cells, Female, Histocompatibility, Histocompatibility Testing, HLA Antigens, Humans, Regeneration, Stem Cells, Tissue Donors, Transplantation, Homologous, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Stromal Cells, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review