The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE SAFETY PROFILE OF BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN IN SPINE SURGERY
Abstract
WE REVIEW OUR current understanding of the development and potential clinical applications of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) in spine surgery. We also review the evidence for adverse events associated with the use of BMP and suggest potential reasons for these events and means of complication avoidance. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for anterior lumbar interbody fusion; rhBMP-7, on the other hand, is approved for long bone defects and has received a humanitarian device exemption for revision posterolateral lumbar operations and recalcitrant long bone unions. Nevertheless, "off-label" use in various spinal procedures has been reported and is increasing in frequency. Specific guidelines for rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 use are lacking because of the limited availability of randomized controlled clinical trials and its diverse use in many spinal applications. Mechanisms of delivery, carrier type, graft position, surgical location, and variations in BMP concentration may differ from one surgery to the next. Adverse events linked to either rhBMP-2 or rhBMP-7 use include ectopic bone formation, bone resorption or remodeling at the graft site, hematoma, neck swelling, and painful seroma. Other potential theoretical concerns include carcinogenicity and teratogenic effects. In this review, we provide the reader with a historical perspective on BMP, current and past research to support its use in spinal procedures, and a critical analysis of the complications reported thus far.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
James, A. W., LaChaud, G., Shen, J., Asatrian, G., Nguyen, V., Zhang, X., Ting, K., & Soo, C. (2016) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0357 · Cited by 1,131
Cahill, K. S. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.956 · Cited by 489
Potent inhibition of heterotopic ossification by nuclear retinoic acid receptor-γ agonists
Shimono, K., Tung, W.-E., Macolino, C., Chi, A. H.-T., Didizian, J. H., Mundy, C., Chandraratna, R. A., Mishina, Y., Enomoto-Iwamoto, M., Pacifici, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2334 · Cited by 334
Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration
Boerckel, J. D., Kolambkar, Y. M., Dupont, K. M., Uhrig, B. A., Phelps, E. A., Stevens, H. Y., García, A. J., & Guldberg, R. E. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063 · Cited by 323
Department of Orthopaedics, U. U., Koolen, M., Longoni, A., van der Stok, J., Van der Jagt, O., Gawlitta, D., & Weinans, H. (2019) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v038a08 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Benglis, D., Wang, M. Y., & Levi, A. D.
- Venue
- Operative Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- ONS423-ONS431
- ISSN
- 2332-4252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000336408
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE SAFETY PROFILE OF BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN IN SPINE SURGERY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1227/01.neu.0000326030.24220.d8
- The paper
- Benglis, D., Wang, M. Y., & Levi, A. D. (2008). A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE SAFETY PROFILE OF BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN IN SPINE SURGERY. Operative Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000326030.24220.d8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.