The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo
Open accessAbstract
Mouse pre-implantation development gives rise to the blastocyst, which is made up of at least three distinct cell types: the trophectoderm (TE) that surrounds a cavity, and an inner cell mass (ICM) comprising the primitive endoderm (PE) and epiblast (EPI). However, the underlying mechanisms involved in patterning the cleavage-stage embryo are still unresolved. By analyzing the distribution of the transcription factors Oct4 (Pou5f1), Cdx2 and Nanog at precisely defined stages in pre-implantation development, we were able to identify critical events leading to the divergence of TE, EPI and PE lineages. We found that Oct4 is present in all cells until late blastocyst, gradually disappearing from the TE thereafter. The expression patterns of both Cdx2 and Nanog exhibit two specific phases, culminating in their restriction to TE and EPI, respectively. In the first phase, starting after compaction, blastomeres show highly variable Cdx2 and Nanog protein levels. Importantly, the variability in Nanog levels is independent of position within the morula,whereas Cdx2 variability may originate from asymmetric cell divisions at the 8-cell stage in a non-stereotypic way. Furthermore, there is initially no reciprocal relationship between Cdx2 and Oct4 or between Cdx2 and Nanog protein levels. In the second phase, a definite pattern is established,possibly by a sorting process that accommodates intrinsic and extrinsic cues. Based on these results, we propose a model in which early embryonic mouse patterning includes stochastic processes, consistent with the highly regulative capacity of the embryo. This may represent a feature unique to early mammalian development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium.
Larue, L., Ohsugi, M., Hirchenhain, J., & Kemler, R. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.17.8263 · Cited by 930
Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T., & Rossant, J. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.020 · Cited by 898
ENZYME INDUCTION AS AN ALL-OR-NONE PHENOMENON
Novick, A., & Weiner, M. (1957) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.43.7.553 · Cited by 891
Cited by
Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo
Arnold, S. J., & Robertson, E. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2618 · Cited by 816
Lineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo
Chazaud, C., & Yamanaka, Y. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.128314 · Cited by 317
Ohnishi, Y., Huber, W., Tsumura, A., Kang, M., Xenopoulos, P., Kurimoto, K., Oleś, A. K., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Saitou, M., Hadjantonakis, A.-K., et al. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2881 · Cited by 300
Self-citationKang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.084996 · Cited by 284
Challenges in measuring and understanding biological noise
Eling, N., Morgan, M. D., & Marioni, J. C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0130-6 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietrich, J.-E., & Hiiragi, T.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2007-12-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4219-4231
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2122864540
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.003798
- The paper
- Dietrich, J.-E., & Hiiragi, T. (2007). Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.003798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.