The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence that Myc activation depletes the epidermal stem cell compartment by modulating adhesive interactions with the local microenvironment
Abstract
Activation of Myc (c-Myc) causes epidermal cells to exit the stem cell compartment and differentiate into sebocytes and interfollicular epidermis at the expense of the hair lineages. To investigate how Myc exerts these effects we analysed the transcription of more than 10,000 genes following Myc activation in the basal layer of mouse epidermis for 1 or 4 days. The major classes of induced genes were involved in synthesis and processing of RNA and proteins, in cell proliferation and in differentiation. More than 40% of the downregulated genes encoded cell adhesion and cytoskeleton proteins. Repression of these genes resulted in profound changes in the adhesive and motile behaviour of keratinocytes. Myc activation inhibited cell motility and wound healing, correlating with decreased expression of a large number of extracellular matrix proteins. Cell adhesion and spreading were also impaired,and this correlated with decreased expression of the α6β4 integrin,decreased formation of hemidesmosomes and decreased assembly of the actomyosin cytoskeleton. We propose that Myc stimulates exit from the stem cell compartment by reducing adhesive interactions with the local microenvironment or niche, and that the failure of hair differentiation reflects an inability of keratinocytes to migrate along the outer root sheath to receive hair inductive stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frisch, S. M., & Screaton, R. A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00251-9 · Cited by 1,249
Arnold, I., & Watt, F. M. (2001) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00154-3 · Cited by 341
Self-citationDeregulated expression of c-Myc depletes epidermal stem cells
Waikel, R. L., Kawachi, Y., Waikel, P. A., Wang, X.-J., & Roop, D. R. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/88889 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Dang, C. V. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003 · Cited by 3,390
The extracellular matrix: A dynamic niche in cancer progression
Lu, P., Weaver, V. M., & Werb, Z. (2012) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201102147 · Cited by 3,024
Extracellular Matrix Degradation and Remodeling in Development and Disease
Lu, P., Takai, K., Weaver, V. M., & Werb, Z. (2011) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a005058 · Cited by 2,265
Dang, C. V., O’Donnell, K. A., Zeller, K. I., Nguyen, T., Osthus, R. C., & Li, F. (2006) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.07.014 · Cited by 1,188
Eilers, M., & Eisenman, R. N. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1712408 · Cited by 927
Metadata
- Authors
- Frye, M., Gardner, C., Li, E. R., Arnold, I., & Watt, F. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-06-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2793-2808
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1978189045
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.