The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct and concentration-dependent regulation of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 by Pax6
Open accessAbstract
Expression of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 is controlled by several enhancer elements, with the E1 element active in restricted progenitor domains in the embryonic spinal cord and telencephalon that express the homeodomain protein Pax6. We show that Pax6 function is both required and sufficient to activate this enhancer, and we identify one evolutionary conserved sequence in the E1 element with high similarity to a consensus Pax6 binding site. This conserved sequence binds Pax6 protein with low affinity both in vitro and in vivo, and its disruption results in a severe decrease in E1 activity in the spinal cord and in its abolition in the cerebral cortex. The regulation of Neurogenin2 by Pax6 is thus direct. Pax6 is expressed in concentration gradients in both spinal cord and telencephalon. We demonstrate that the E1 element is only activated by high concentrations of Pax6 protein, and that this requirement explains the restriction of E1 enhancer activity to domains of high Pax6 expression levels in the medioventral spinal cord and lateral cortex. By modifying the E1 enhancer sequence, we also show that the spatial pattern of enhancer activity is determined by the affinity of its binding site for Pax6. Together, these data demonstrate that direct transcriptional regulation accounts for the coordination between mechanisms of patterning and neurogenesis. They also provide evidence that Pax6 expression gradients are involved in establishing borders of gene expression domains in different regions of the nervous system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and transcriptional codes
Jessell, T. M. (2000) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35049541 · Cited by 2,089
The bHLH Transcription Factors OLIG2 and OLIG1 Couple Neuronal and Glial Subtype Specification
Zhou, Q., & Anderson, D. J. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00677-3 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Hevner, R. F., Hodge, R. D., Daza, R. A. M., & Englund, C. (2006) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2006.03.004 · Cited by 410
Low Affinity Binding Site Clusters Confer Hox Specificity and Regulatory Robustness
Crocker, J., Abe, N., Rinaldi, L., McGregor, A. P., Frankel, N., Wang, S., Alsawadi, A., Valenti, P., Plaza, S., Payre, F., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.041 · Cited by 363
Spatial and temporal specification of neural fates by transcription factor codes
Guillemot, F. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.006379 · Cited by 308
Self-citationDeepSTARR predicts enhancer activity from DNA sequence and enables the de novo design of enhancers
de Almeida, B. P., Reiter, F., Pagani, M., & Stark, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.05.463203 · Cited by 284
de Almeida, B. P., Reiter, F., Pagani, M., & Stark, A. (2022) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-022-01048-5 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Scardigli, R., Bäumer, N., Gruss, P., Guillemot, F., & Le Roux, I.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-07-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3269-3281
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2031482377
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.