The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Requirements for FGF3 and FGF10 during inner ear formation
Open accessAbstract
Members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) gene family control formation of the body plan and organogenesis in vertebrates. FGF3 is expressed in the developing hindbrain and has been shown to be involved in inner ear development of different vertebrate species, including zebrafish, Xenopus, chick and mouse. In the mouse, insertion of a neomycin resistance gene into the Fgf3 gene via homologous recombination results in severe developmental defects during differentiation of the otic vesicle. We have addressed the precise roles of FGF3 and other FGF family members during formation of the murine inner ear using both loss- and gain-of-function experiments. We generated a new mutant allele lacking the entire FGF3-coding region but surprisingly found no evidence for severe defects either during inner ear development or in the mature sensory organ,suggesting the functional involvement of other FGF family members during its formation. Ectopic expression of FGF10 in the developing hindbrain of transgenic mice leads to the formation of ectopic vesicles, expressing some otic marker genes and thus indicating a role for FGF10 during otic vesicle formation. Expression analysis of FGF10 during mouse embryogenesis reveals a highly dynamic pattern of expression in the developing hindbrain, partially overlapping with FGF3 expression and coinciding with formation of the inner ear. However, FGF10 mutant mice have been reported to display only mild defects during inner ear differentiation. We thus created double mutant mice for FGF3 and FGF10, which form severely reduced otic vesicles, suggesting redundant roles of these FGFs, acting in combination as neural signals for otic vesicle formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptor Specificity of the Fibroblast Growth Factor Family
Ornitz, D. M., Xu, J., Colvin, J. S., McEwen, D. G., MacArthur, C. A., Coulier, F., Gao, G., & Goldfarb, M. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.25.15292 · Cited by 1,871
Cited by
The Fibroblast Growth Factor signaling pathway
Ornitz, D. M., & Itoh, N. (2015) · WIREs Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.176 · Cited by 2,050
Mechanisms underlying differential responses to FGF signaling
Dailey, L., Ambrosetti, D., Mansukhani, A., & Basilico, C. (2005) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.01.007 · Cited by 649
Restoration of auditory evoked responses by human ES-cell-derived otic progenitors
Chen, W., Jongkamonwiwat, N., Abbas, L., Eshtan, S. J., Johnson, S. L., Kuhn, S., Milo, M., Thurlow, J. K., Andrews, P. W., Marcotti, W., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11415 · Cited by 388
Role of FGF/FGFR signaling in skeletal development and homeostasis: learning from mouse models
Su, N., Jin, M., & Chen, L. (2014) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/boneres.2014.3 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez, Y., Alonso, M. T., Vendrell, V., Zelarayan, L. C., Chamero, P., Theil, T., Bösl, M. R., Kato, S., Maconochie, M., Riethmacher, D., & Schimmang, T.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-12-22
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 6329-6338
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2118334448
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.