The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reiterated Wnt signaling during zebrafish neural crest development
Abstract
While Wnt/β-catenin signaling is known to be involved in the development of neural crest cells in zebrafish, it is unclear which Wnts are involved, and when they are required. To address these issues we employed a zebrafish line that was transgenic for an inducible inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, and inhibited endogenous Wnt/β-catenin signaling at discrete times in development. Using this approach, we defined a critical period for Wnt signaling in the initial induction of neural crest,which is distinct from the later period of development when pigment cells are specified from neural crest. Blocking Wnt signaling during this early period interfered with neural crest formation without blocking development of dorsal spinal neurons. Transplantation experiments suggest that neural crest precursors must directly transduce a Wnt signal. With regard to identifying which endogenous Wnt is responsible for this initial critical period, we established that wnt8 is expressed in the appropriate time and place to participate in this process. Supporting a role for Wnt8, blocking its function with antisense morpholino oligonucleotides eliminates initial expression of neural crest markers. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Wnt signals are critical for the initial induction of zebrafish neural crest and suggest that this signaling pathway plays reiterated roles in its development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dorsky, R. I., Sheldahl, L. C., & Moon, R. T. (2002) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0515 · Cited by 287 · cited 2×
“Transgenic TOPdGFP fish (Tg (TOP:dGFP)w25) express d2EGFP under control of four Lef binding sites and have been described previously (Dorsky et al., 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
Goessling, W., North, T. E., Loewer, S., Lord, A. M., Lee, S., Stoick-Cooper, C. L., Weidinger, G., Puder, M., Daley, G. Q., Moon, R. T., et al. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.015 · Cited by 699
Self-citationBone morphogenetic protein signalling and vertebrate nervous system development
Liu, A., & Niswander, L. A. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1805 · Cited by 332
Essential role of non-canonical Wnt signalling in neural crest migration
De Calisto, J., Araya, C., Marchant, L., Riaz, C. F., & Mayor, R. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01857 · Cited by 304
Sequential actions of Pax3 and Pax7 drive xanthophore development in zebrafish neural crest
Minchin, J. E. N., & Hughes, S. M. (2008) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.058 · Cited by 155
β-catenin/Wnt signaling controls progenitor fate in the developing and regenerating zebrafish retina
Meyers, J. R., Hu, L., Moses, A., Kaboli, K., Papandrea, A., & Raymond, P. A. (2012) · Neural Development · doi:10.1186/1749-8104-7-30 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, J. L., Bonner, J., Modrell, M., Ragland, J. W., Moon, R. T., Dorsky, R. I., & Raible, D. W.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-03-15
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1299-1308
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2172096465
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.