The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in oocytes and early pre-implantation embryos
Open accessAbstract
Epigenetic modifications of the genome, such as covalent modification of histone residues, ensure appropriate gene activation during pre-implantation development, and are probably involved in the asymmetric reprogramming of the parental genomes after fertilization. We investigated the methylation patterns of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3/K9), and the regulatory mechanism involved in the asymmetric remodeling of parental genomes during early preimplantation development in mice. Immunocytochemistry with an antibody that specifically recognizes methylated H3/K9 showed a very weak or absent methylation signal in the male pronucleus, whereas a distinct methylation signal was detected in the female pronucleus. This asymmetric H3/K9 methylation pattern in the different parental genomes persisted until the two-cell stage. However, de novo methylation of H3/K9 occurred and the asymmetry was lost during the four-cell stage. The unmethylated male pronucleus underwent de novo methylation when it was transferred into enucleated GV- or MII-stage oocytes, which suggests that histone H3 methylase is active before fertilization, but not afterwards, and that the asymmetric methylation pattern is generated by this change in methylase activity in the cytoplasm after fertilization. Thus, histone H3 is methylated only in the maternal chromosomes, which are present in the oocytes before fertilization, and is not methylated in the paternal chromosomes, which are absent. The maintenance of asymmetric H3/K9 methylation patterns in early embryos is an active process that depends on protein synthesis and zygotic transcription, as de novo methylation in the male pronucleus occurred when either protein synthesis or gene expression was inhibited by cycloheximide orα-amanitin, respectively. In addition, corresponding de novo methylation of H3/K9 and DNA occurred when the male pronucleus was transferred to an enucleated GV oocyte. Our results suggest that H3/K9 methylation is an epigenetic marker of parental genome origin during early preimplantation development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene Action in the X-chromosome of the Mouse (Mus musculus L.)
LYON, M. F. (1961) · Nature · doi:10.1038/190372a0 · Cited by 3,978
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Reik, W., Dean, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063443 · Cited by 3,078
Schultz, D. C., Ayyanathan, K., Negorev, D., Maul, G. G., & Rauscher, F. J. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.973302 · Cited by 1,313
Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation is an epigenetic imprint of facultative heterochromatin
Peters, A. H. F. M., Mermoud, J. E., O'Carroll, D., Pagani, M., Schweizer, D., Brockdorff, N., & Jenuwein, T. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng789 · Cited by 502
Timely translation during the mouse oocyte-to-embryo transition
Oh, B., Hwang, S.-Y., McLaughlin, J., Solter, D., & Knowles, B. B. (2000) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.127.17.3795 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Lepikhov, K., Arand, J., Wossidlo, M., & Walter, J. (2012) · Encyclopedia of Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/3527600906.mcb.201100038 · Cited by 336
Wei, J., Antony, J., Meng, F., MacLean, P., Rhind, R., Laible, G., & Oback, B. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06569-2 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Kim, J.-M., & Aoki, F.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-05-15
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2269-2280
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2171767359
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.