The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo evidence for short- and long-range cell communication in cranial neural crest cells
Abstract
The proper assembly of craniofacial structures and the peripheral nervous system requires neural crest cells to emerge from the neural tube and navigate over long distances to the branchial arches. Cell and molecular studies have shed light on potential intrinsic and extrinsic cues, which, in combination,are thought to ensure the induction and specification of cranial neural crest cells. However, much less is known about how migrating neural crest cells interpret and integrate signals from the microenvironment and other neural crest cells to sort into and maintain the stereotypical pattern of three spatially segregated streams. Here, we explore the extent to which cranial neural crest cells use cell-to-cell and cell-environment interactions to pathfind. The cell membrane and cytoskeletal elements in chick premigratory neural crest cells were labeled in vivo. Three-dimensional reconstructions of migrating neural crest cells were then obtained using confocal static and time-lapse imaging. It was found that neural crest cells maintained nearly constant contact with other migrating neural crest cells, in addition to the microenvironment. Cells used lamellipodia or short, thin filopodia (1-2 μm wide) for local contacts (<20 μm). Non-local, long distance contact (up to 100 μm) was initiated by filopodia that extended and retracted, extended and tracked, or tethered two non-neighboring cells. Intriguingly, the cell-to-cell contacts often stimulated a cell to change direction in favor of a neighboring cell's trajectory. In summary, our results present in vivo evidence for local and long-range neural crest cell interactions, suggesting a possible role for these contacts in directional guidance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cranial neural crest and the building of the vertebrate head
Santagati, F., & Rijli, F. M. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1221 · Cited by 461
Cited by
Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease
Thiery, J. P., Acloque, H., Huang, R. Y. J., & Nieto, M. A. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007 · Cited by 9,931
Minoux, M., & Rijli, F. M. (2010) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.040048 · Cited by 507
Wiring through tunneling nanotubes--from electrical signals to organelle transfer
Abounit, S., & Zurzolo, C. (2012) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.083279 · Cited by 386
Complement Fragment C3a Controls Mutual Cell Attraction during Collective Cell Migration
Carmona-Fontaine, C., Theveneau, E., Tzekou, A., Tada, M., Woods, M., Page, K. M., Parsons, M., Lambris, J. D., & Mayor, R. (2011) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.012 · Cited by 317
Chapter 8 Hox Genes and Segmentation of the Vertebrate Hindbrain
Tümpel, S., Wiedemann, L. M., & Krumlauf, R. (2009) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(09)88004-6 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Teddy, J. M., & Kulesa, P. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-12-15
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6141-6151
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2032756435
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo evidence for short- and long-range cell communication in cranial neural crest cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.01534
- The paper
- Teddy, J. M., & Kulesa, P. M. (2004). In vivo evidence for short- and long-range cell communication in cranial neural crest cells. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.