The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A discrete period of FGF-induced Erk1/2 signalling is required for vertebrate neural specification
Abstract
Neural tissue formation is induced by growth factors that activate networks of signal transduction cascades that ultimately lead to the expression of early neural genes, including transcription factors of the SoxB family. Here,we report that fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-induced Erk1/2 (Mapk3 and Mapk1,respectively) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), but not phosphatidylinositol 3′-OH kinase (PI3K, Pik3r1), signalling is required for neural specification in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and in the chick embryo. Further, blocking Erk1/2 inhibits the onset of key SoxB genes in both mouse ES cells (Sox1) and chick embryos (Sox2 and Sox3) and, in both contexts, Erk1/2 signalling is required during only a narrow time window, as neural specification takes place. In the absence of Erk1/2 signalling, differentiation of ES cells stalls following Fgf5 upregulation. Using differentiating ES cells as a model for neural specification, we demonstrate that sustained Erk1/2 activation controls the transition from an Fgf5-positive, primitive ectoderm-like cell state to a neural progenitor cell state without attenuating bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling and we also define the minimum period of Erk1/2 activity required to mediate this key developmental step. Together, these findings identify a conserved, specific and stage-dependent requirement for Erk1/2 signalling downstream of FGF-induced neural specification in higher vertebrates and provide insight into the signalling dynamics governing this process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture
Ying, Q.-L., Stavridis, M., Griffiths, D., Li, M., & Smith, A. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt780 · Cited by 1,504
Self-citationWood, H. B., & Episkopou, V. (1999) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00116-1 · Cited by 550 · cited 1×
“This is indicated by the onset of expression of genes characteristic of neuroepithelium, which include members of the SoxB family of transcription factors (Pevny et al., 1998; Rex et al., 1997; Wood and Episkopou, 1999).”
BackgroundNeural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions
Stern, C. D. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01794 · Cited by 421 · cited 4×
“Experiments in the early chick embryo also suggest that FGF acts independently of BMP activity in neural induction (see Stern, 2005b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAn essential function of the mitogen‐activated protein kinase Erk2 in mouse trophoblast development
Saba‐El‐Leil, M. K., Vella, F. D. J., Vernay, B., Voisin, L., Chen, L., Labrecque, N., Ang, S., & Meloche, S. (2003) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.embor939 · Cited by 366
Cited by
The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal
Ying, Q.-L., Wray, J., Nichols, J., Batlle-Morera, L., Doble, B., Woodgett, J., Cohen, P., & Smith, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06968 · Cited by 3,442
Kang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.084996 · Cited by 284
Network inference with Granger causality ensembles on single-cell transcriptomics
Deshpande, A., Chu, L.-F., Stewart, R., & Gitter, A. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110333 · Cited by 130
Anterior definitive endoderm from ESCs reveals a role for FGF signaling
Morrison, G. M., Oikonomopoulou, I., Migueles, R. P., Soneji, S., Livigni, A., Enver, T., & Brickman, J. M. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.021 · Cited by 121
Stavridis, M. P., Collins, B. J., & Storey, K. G. (2010) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.043117 · Cited by 124
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stavridis, M. P., Lunn, J. S., Collins, B. J., & Storey, K. G.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2007-08-15
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2889-2894
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2161594343
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.