The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilayer mounting enables long-term imaging of zebrafish development in a light sheet microscope
Abstract
Light sheet microscopy techniques, such as selective plane illumination microscopy (SPIM), are ideally suited for time-lapse imaging of developmental processes lasting several hours to a few days. The success of this promising technology has mainly been limited by the lack of suitable techniques for mounting fragile samples. Embedding zebrafish embryos in agarose, which is common in conventional confocal microscopy, has resulted in severe growth defects and unreliable results. In this study, we systematically quantified the viability and mobility of zebrafish embryos mounted under more suitable conditions. We found that tubes made of fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) filled with low concentrations of agarose or methylcellulose provided an optimal balance between sufficient confinement of the living embryo in a physiological environment over 3 days and optical clarity suitable for fluorescence imaging. We also compared the effect of different concentrations of Tricaine on the development of zebrafish and provide guidelines for its optimal use depending on the application. Our results will make light sheet microscopy techniques applicable to more fields of developmental biology, in particular the multiview long-term imaging of zebrafish embryos and other small organisms. Furthermore, the refinement of sample preparation for in toto and in vivo imaging will promote other emerging optical imaging techniques, such as optical projection tomography (OPT).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis
Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., Preibisch, S., Rueden, C., Saalfeld, S., Schmid, B., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019 · Cited by 66,890
The Effects of Hemodynamic Force on Embryonic Development
CULVER, J. C., & DICKINSON, M. E. (2010) · Microcirculation · doi:10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00025.x · Cited by 173
Cited by
Rapid 3D light-sheet microscopy with a tunable lens
Fahrbach, F. O., Voigt, F. F., Schmid, B., Helmchen, F., & Huisken, J. (2013) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.21.021010 · Cited by 347
Self-citationLight-sheet microscopy: a tutorial
Olarte, O. E., Andilla, J., Gualda, E. J., & Loza-Alvarez, P. (2018) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.10.000111 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufmann, A., Mickoleit, M., Weber, M., & Huisken, J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2012-09-01
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3242-3247
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2049784603
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.