Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The extracellular matrix of lip wounds in fetal, neonatal and adult mice

Whitby, David J., Ferguson, Mark W. J.·1991·Development

Abstract

Wound healing in the fetus occurs rapidly, by a regenerative process and without an inflammatory response, resulting in complete restitution of normal tissue function. By contrast, in the adult, wounds heal with scar formation, which may impair function and inhibit further growth. The cellular mechanisms underlying these differing forms of wound healing are unknown but the extracellular matrix (ECM), through its effects on cell function, may play a key role. We have studied the ECM in upper lip wounds of adult, neonatal and fetal mice at days 14, 16 and 18 of gestation. The spatial and temporal distribution of collagen types I, in, IV, V and VI, fibronectin, tenascin, laminin, chondroitin and heparan sulphates were examined immunohisto-chemically. Results from the fetal groups were essentially similar whilst there were distinct differences between fetus, neonate and adult. Fibronectin was present at the surface of the wound in all groups at 1 h post-wounding. Tenascin was also present at the wound surface but the time at which it was first present differed between fetus (1 h), neonate (12 h) and adult (24 h). The time of first appearance paralleled the rate of wound healing which was most rapid in the fetus and slowest in the adult. Tenascin inhibits the cell adhesion effect of fibronectin and during development the appearance of tenascin correlates with the initiation of cell migration. During wound healing the appearance of tenascin preceded cell migration and the rapid closure of fetal wounds may be due to the early appearance of tenascin in the wound. Collagen types I, HI, IV, V and VI were present in all three wound groups but the timing and pattern of collagen deposition differed, with restoration of the normal collagen pattern in the fetus and a scar pattern in the adult. This confirms that lack of scarring in fetal wounds is due to the organisation of collagen within the wound and not simply lack of collagen formation. The distribution of chondroitin sulphate differed between normal fetal and adult tissues and between fetal and adult wounds. Its presence in the fetal wound may alter collagen fibril formation. No inflammatory response was seen in the fetal wounds. The differences in the ECM of fetal and adult wounds suggests that it may be possible to alter the adult wound so that it heals by a fetal-like process without scar formation, loss of tissue function or restriction of growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.112.2.651

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
Whitby, D. J., & Ferguson, M. W. J.
Venue
Development
Published
1991-06-01
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
651-668
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2184860549
Cited by
388
References
3
FWCI
20.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.