Cited by 596Collagen: Extraction and CharacterizationConnective tissue disorders researchCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: interaction of types I and V collagen regulates fibril diameter

Birk, David E., Fitch, John M., Babiarz, Joanne P., Doane, Kathleen J., Linsenmayer, Thomas F.·1990·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

The small-diameter fibrils of the chick corneal stroma are heterotypic, composed of both collagen types I and V. This tissue has a high concentration of type V collagen relative to other type I-containing tissues with larger-diameter fibrils, suggesting that heterotypic interactions may have a regulatory role in the control of fibril diameter. The interactions of collagen types I and V were studied using an in vitro self-assembly system. Collagens were purified from lathyritic chick embryos in the presence of protease inhibitors. The type V collagen preparations contained higher molecular weight forms of the α1 (V) and α2(V) chains constituting 60-70% of the total. Rotary-shadow electron micrographs showed a persistence of a small, pepsin-sensitive terminal region in an amount consistent with that seen by electrophoresis. In vitro, this purified type V collagen formed thin fibrils with no apparent periodicity, while type I collagen fibrils had a broad distribution of large diameters. However, when type I collagen was mixed with increasing amounts of type V collagen a progressive and significant decrease in both the mean fibril diameter and the variance was observed for D periodic fibrils. The amino-terminal domain of the type V collagen molecule was required for this regulatory effect and in its absence little diameter reducing activity was observed. Electron microscopy using collagen type specific monoclonal antibodies demonstrated that the fibrils formed were heterotypic, containing both collagen types I and V. These data indicate that the interaction of type V with type I collagen is one mechanism modulating fibril diameter and is at least partially responsible for the regulation of collagen fibril formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.95.4.649

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In corneal stroma, type V collagen molecules retain their amino-terminal non-collagenous domain.

    “It was also found that in corneal stroma, type V collagen molecules retained their amino-terminal non-collagenous domain.”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Birk et al., 1990

  • In vitro experiments using purified collagen I and V showed that the type V collagen molecule terminal domain was necessary to regulate the diameters of the formed fibrils.

    “In vitro experiments aimed at creating fibrils using purified collagen I and collagen V molecules, showed that the type V collagen molecule terminal domain was necessary to regulate the diameters of the formed fibrils (Birk et al., 1990).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Birk et al., 1990

  • Purified type I collagen forms fibrils of varying diameters in vitro, while type V collagen forms small fibrils.

    “Both collagen types, when purified, could assemble in vitro to form fibrils, but in this case type I collagen formed fibrils of varying diameters, while type V formed small fibrils.”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Birk et al., 1990

  • Corneal fibrils are a blend of type I and type V collagens, and the collagen V to collagen I ratio is noticeably higher in corneal stroma than in other tissues.

    “It was found that corneal fibrils were a blend of type I and type V collagens, but unlike in other tissues, the collagen V to collagen I ratio was noticeably higher in corneal stroma (Birk et al., 1990).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Birk et al., 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birk, D. E., Fitch, J. M., Babiarz, J. P., Doane, K. J., & Linsenmayer, T. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
1990-04-01
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
649-657
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W1917942675
Cited by
596
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY005129, EY05191, EY05129)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
collagen fibrillogenesis, type I collagen, type V collagen, corneal stroma, N-terminal domain, chick embryo
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Chick Embryo, Collagen, Connective Tissue, Cornea, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Immunohistochemistry, Polymers, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review