The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Retinoic acid modifies development of the midbrain-hindbrain border and affects cranial ganglion formation in zebrafish embryos
Abstract
Considerable evidence now suggests that retinoic acid (RA) is an important modulator of patterning events in early neuronal development in vertebrates. In this paper, we describe the effects of exogenously applied RA on early neural development in the zebrafish embryo. Neural anatomy is assessed by immunocytochemical and histochemical analysis of the developing embryo in whole mounts at 24 h post-fertilization. RA was applied for one hour at concentrations ranging from 10−9 to 10−6M to embryos at 50% epiboly, the midgastrula stage, and at 10−7M to embryos at early and late gastrula stages. The neuroanatomical analysis shows that 10−7M RA causes a defined lesion to the developing central nervous system which corresponds to a loss of a region of the brain in the caudal midbrain-rostral hindbrain area, the precursor of the cerebellum and associated neural structures. The region that fails to develop corresponds to the cranial expression domain of the engrailed protein as assessed by the monoclonal antibody 4D9 (Patel et al. 1989: Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids and chordates. Cell 58, 955-968). Structures caudal to rhombomere 4 are unaffected by 10 7 M RA, as are the cranial midbrain and forebrain: 10−7M RA also affects the development of cranial ganglia, principally the Vth, anterior lateral line and VUIth ganglia, suggesting that RA affects normal development of the cranial neural crest. Effects of RA at stages immediately prior to and after gastrulation show some similar and some distinct features. Results are discussed in terms of the possible role of RA as an endogenous moderator of normal head development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organization of hindbrain segments in the zebrafish embryo
Trevarrow, B., Marks, D. L., & Kimmel, C. B. (1990) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(90)90194-k · Cited by 506
Cited by
Homeobox genes and axial patterning
McGinnis, W., & Krumlauf, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-n · Cited by 2,674
Retinoid signalling in the development of the central nervous system
Maden, M. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn963 · Cited by 428
Depew, M. J., Tucker, A. S., & Sharpe, P. T. (2002) · Mouse Development · doi:10.1016/b978-012597951-1/50023-8 · Cited by 259
Function and Regulation of AUTS2, a Gene Implicated in Autism and Human Evolution
Oksenberg, N., Stevison, L., Wall, J. D., & Ahituv, N. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003221 · Cited by 167
Zebrafish cerebrospinal fluid mediates cell survival through a retinoid signaling pathway
Chang, J. T., Lehtinen, M. K., & Sive, H. (2016) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.22300 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Holder, N., & Hill, J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1991-12-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1159-1170
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2149612620
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retinoic acid modifies development of the midbrain-hindbrain border and affects cranial ganglion formation in zebrafish embryos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.113.4.1159
- The paper
- Holder, N., & Hill, J. (1991). Retinoic acid modifies development of the midbrain-hindbrain border and affects cranial ganglion formation in zebrafish embryos. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.113.4.1159
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.