The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mouse embryonic germ (EG) cell lines: transmission through the germline and differences in the methylation imprint of insulin-like growth factor 2 receptor (Igf2r) gene compared with embryonic stem (ES) cell lines
Abstract
Primordial germ cells of the mouse cultured on feeder layers with leukemia inhibitory factor, Steel factor and basic fibroblast growth factor give rise to cells that resemble undifferentiated blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cells. These primordial germ cell-derived embryonic germ cells can be induced to differentiate extensively in culture, form teratocarcinomas when injected into nude mice and contribute to chimeras when injected into host blastocysts. Here, we report the derivation of multiple embryonic germ cell lines from 8.5 days post coitum embryos of C57BL/6 inbred mice. Four independent embryonic germ cell lines with normal male karyotypes have formed chimeras when injected into BALB/c host blastocysts and two of these lines have transmitted coat color markers through the germline. We also show that pluripotent cell lines capable of forming teratocarcinomas and coat color chimeras can be established from primordial germ cells of 8.0 days p.c. embryos and 12.5 days p.c. genital ridges. We have examined the methylation status of the putative imprinting box of the insulin-like growth factor type 2 receptor gene (Igf2r) in these embryonic germ cell lines. No correlation was found between methylation pattern and germline competence. A significant difference was observed between embryonic stem cell and embryonic germ cell lines in their ability to maintain the methylation imprint of the Igf2r gene in culture. This may illustrate a fundamental difference between these two cell types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The dominant-white spotting (W) locus of the mouse encodes the c-kit proto-oncogene
Geissler, E. N., Ryan, M. A., & Housman, D. E. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(88)90020-7 · Cited by 1,287
Cited by
In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state
Wernig, M., Meissner, A., Foreman, R., Brambrink, T., Ku, M., Hochedlinger, K., Bernstein, B. E., & Jaenisch, R. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05944 · Cited by 2,676
Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome
Reik, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35047554 · Cited by 2,285
Postic, C., Shiota, M., Niswender, K. D., Jetton, T. L., Chen, Y., Moates, J. M., Shelton, K. D., Lindner, J., Cherrington, A. D., & Magnuson, M. A. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.1.305 · Cited by 1,302
Generation of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Neonatal Mouse Testis
Kanatsu-Shinohara, M., Inoue, K., Lee, J., Yoshimoto, M., Ogonuki, N., Miki, H., Baba, S., Kato, T., Kazuki, Y., Toyokuni, S., et al. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.011 · Cited by 814
Embryonic Stem Cells: Prospects for Developmental Biology and Cell Therapy
Wobus, A. M., & Boheler, K. R. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00054.2003 · Cited by 782
Metadata
- Authors
- Labosky, P. A., Barlow, D. P., & Hogan, B. L. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3197-3204
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2149228985
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.