The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cranial paraxial mesoderm: regionalisation of cell fate and impact on craniofacial development in mouse embryos
Abstract
A combination of micromanipulative cell grafting and flu-orescent cell labelling techniques were used to examine the developmental fate of the cranial paraxial mesoderm of the 8.5-day early-somite-stage mouse embryo. Mesodermal cells isolated from seven regions of the cranial mesoderm, identified on the basis of their topographical association with specific brain segments were assessed for their contribution to craniofacial morphogenesis during 48 hours of in vitro development. The results demonstrate extensive cell mixing between adjacent but not alternate groups of mesodermal cells and a strict cranial-to-caudal distribution of the paraxial mesoderm to craniofacial structures. A two-segment periodicity similar to the origins of the branchial motor neurons and the distribution of the rhombencephalic neural crest cells was observed as the paraxial mesoderm migrates during formation of the first three branchial arches. The paraxial mesoderm colonises the mesenchymal core of the branchial arches, consistent with the location of the muscle plates. A dorsoventral regionalisation of cell fate similar to that of the somitic mesoderm is also found. This suggests evolution has conserved the fate of the murine cranial paraxial mesoderm as a multiprogenitor population which displays a predominantly myogenic fate. Heterotopic transplantation of cells to different regions of the cranial mesoderm revealed no discernible restriction in cell potency in the craniocaudal axis, reflecting considerable plasticity in the developmental fate of the cranial mesoderm at least at the time of experimentation. The distribution of the different groups of cranial mesoderm matches closely with that of the cranial neural crest cells suggesting the two cell populations may share a common segmental origin and similar destination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cell lineage in mammalian craniofacial mesenchyme.
Yoshida, T., Vivatbutsiri, P., Morriss-Kay, G., Saga, Y., & Iseki, S. (2008) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/j.mod.2008.06.007 · Cited by 384
Depew, M. J., Tucker, A. S., & Sharpe, P. T. (2002) · Mouse Development · doi:10.1016/b978-012597951-1/50023-8 · Cited by 259
sucker encodes a zebrafish Endothelin-1 required for ventral pharyngeal arch development
Miller, C. T., Schilling, Lee, Parker, J., & Kimmel, C. B. (2000) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.127.17.3815 · Cited by 259
Wnt signaling mediates regional specification in the vertebrate face
Brugmann, S. A., Goodnough, L. H., Gregorieff, A., Leucht, P., ten Berge, D., Fuerer, C., Clevers, H., Nusse, R., & Helms, J. A. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.005132 · Cited by 213
The development of the mammalian outer and middle ear
Anthwal, N., & Thompson, H. (2016) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12344 · Cited by 197
Defects in pathfinding by cranial neural crest cells in mice lacking the neuregulin receptor ErbB4
Golding, J. P., Trainor, P., Krumlauf, R., & Gassmann, M. (2000) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35000058 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Trainor, P. A., Tan, S.-S., & Tam, P. P. L.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2397-2408
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2134208738
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.