The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology
Abstract
A common form of evolutionary variation between vertebrate taxa is the different numbers of segments that contribute to various regions of the anterior-posterior axis; cervical vertebrae, thoracic vertebrae, etc. The term ‘transposition’ is used to describe this phenomenon. Genetic experiments with homeotic genes in mice have demonstrated that Hox genes are in part responsible for the specification of segmental identity along the anterior-posterior axis, and it has been proposed that an axial Hox code determines the morphology of individual vertebrae (Kessel, M. and Gruss, P. (1990) Science 249, 347-379). This paper presents a comparative study of the developmental patterns of homeobox gene expression and developmental morphology between animals that have homologous regulatory genes but different morphologies. The axia expression boundaries of 23 Hox genes were examined in the paraxial mesoderm of chick, and 16 in mouse embryos by in situ hybridization and immunolocalization techniques. Hox gene anterior expression boundaries were found to be transposed in concert with morphological boundaries. This data contributes a mechanistic level to the assumed homology of these regions in vertebrates. The recognition of mechanistic homology supports the historical homology of basic patterning mechanisms between all organisms that share these genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Homology of the eyeless Gene of Drosophila to the Small eye Gene in Mice and Aniridia in Humans
Quiring, R., Walldorf, U., Kloter, U., & Gehring, W. J. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7914031 · Cited by 1,100
Studies on the structure & development of vertebrates
Goodrich, E. S. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82144 · Cited by 1,082
The zootype and the phylotypic stage
Slack, J. M. W., Holland, P. W. H., & Graham, C. F. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361490a0 · Cited by 699
Cited by
Evo-Devo and an Expanding Evolutionary Synthesis: A Genetic Theory of Morphological Evolution
Carroll, S. B. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.030 · Cited by 2,067
Early animal evolution: emerging views from comparative biology and geology
Knoll, A. H., & Carroll, S. B. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2129 · Cited by 821
The calmodulin pathway and evolution of elongated beak morphology in Darwin's finches
Abzhanov, A., Kuo, W. P., Hartmann, C., Grant, B. R., Grant, P. R., & Tabin, C. J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04843 · Cited by 636
Self-citationHox10 and Hox11 Genes Are Required to Globally Pattern the Mammalian Skeleton
Wellik, D. M., & Capecchi, M. R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1085672 · Cited by 586
One hundred years of positional information.
Wolpert, L. (1996) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(96)80019-9 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, A. C., Nelson, C. E., Morgan, B. A., & Tabin, C.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 333-346
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2124800909
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.