The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genes of the Enhancer of split and achaete-scute complexes are required for a regulatory loop between Notch and Delta during lateral signalling in Drosophila
Abstract
Like the neuroblasts of the central nervous system, sensory organ precursors of the peripheral nervous system of the Drosophila thorax arise as single spaced cells. However, groups of cells initially have neural potential as visualized by the expression of the proneural genes achaete and scute. A class of genes, known as the ‘neurogenic genes’, function to restrict the proportion of cells that differentiate as sensory organ precursors. They mediate cell communication between the competent cells by means of an inhibitory signal, Delta, that is transduced through the Notch receptor and results in a cessation of achaete-scute activity. Here we show that mutation of either the bHLH-encoding genes of the Enhancer of split complex (E(spl)-C) or groucho, like Notch or Delta mutants, cause an overproduction of sensory organ precursors at the expense of epidermis. The mutant cells behave autonomously suggesting that the corresponding gene products are required for reception of the inhibitory signal. Epistasis experiments place both E(spl)-C bHLH-encoding genes and groucho downstream of Notch and upstream of achaete and scute, consistent with the idea that they are part of the Notch signalling cascade. Since all competent cells produce both the receptor and its ligand, it was postulated that Notch and Delta are linked within each cell by a feedback loop. We show, that, like mutant Notch cells, cells mutant for E(spl)-C bHLH-encoding genes or groucho inhibit neighbouring wild-type cells causing them to adopt the epidermal fate. This inhibition requires the genes of the achaete-scute complex (AS-C) which must therefore regulate the signal Delta. Thus there is a regulatory loop between Notch and Delta that is under the transcriptional control of the E(spl)-C and AS-C genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Klämbt, C., Knust, E., Tietze, K., & Campos‐Ortega, J. A. (1989) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03365.x · Cited by 264
Cited by
Notch Signaling: Cell Fate Control and Signal Integration in Development
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D., & Lake, R. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5415.770 · Cited by 5,909
van Es, J. H., van Gijn, M. E., Riccio, O., van den Born, M., Vooijs, M., Begthel, H., Cozijnsen, M., Robine, S., Winton, D. J., Radtke, F., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03659 · Cited by 1,543
Notch signaling: control of cell communication and cell fate
Lai, E. C. (2004) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01074 · Cited by 1,050
Self-Renewal and Cancer of the Gut: Two Sides of a Coin
Radtke, F., & Clevers, H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104815 · Cited by 690
Conservation of the Notch signalling pathway in mammalian neurogenesis
Luis de la Pompa, J., Wakeham, A., Correia, K. M., Samper, E., Brown, S., Aguilera, R. J., Nakano, T., Honjo, T., Mak, T. W., Rossant, J., et al. (1997) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.124.6.1139 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Heitzler, P., Bourouis, M., Ruel, L., Carteret, C., & Simpson, P.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 161-171
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2188357884
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.