The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characterizing the zebrafish organizer: microsurgical analysis at the early-shield stage
Abstract
The appearance of the embryonic shield, a slight thickening at the leading edge of the blastoderm during the formation of the germ ring, is one of the first signs of dorsoventral polarity in the zebrafish embryo. It has been proposed that the shield plays a role in fish embryo patterning similar to that attributed to the amphibian dorsal lip. In a recent study, we fate mapped many of the cells in the region of the forming embryonic shield, and found that neural and mesodermal progenitors are intermingled (Shih, J. and Fraser, S. E. (1995) Development 121, 2755-2765), in contrast to the coherent region of mesodermal progenitors found at the amphibian dorsal lip. Here, we examine the fate and the inductive potential of the embryonic shield to determine if the intermingling reflects a different mode of embryonic patterning than that found in amphibians. Using the microsurgical techniques commonly used in amphibian and avian experimental embryology, we either grafted or deleted the region of the embryonic shield. Homotopic grafting experiments confirmed the fates of cells within the embryonic shield region, showing descendants in the hatching gland, head mesoderm, notochord, somitic mesoderm, endoderm and ventral aspect of the neuraxis. Heterotopic grafting experiments demonstrated that the embryonic shield can organize a second embryonic axis; however, contrary to our expectations based on amphibian research, the graft contributes extensively to the ectopic neuraxis. Microsurgical deletion of the embryonic shield region at the onset of germ ring formation has little effect on neural development: embryos with a well-formed and well-patterned neuraxis develop in the complete absence of notochord cells. While these results show that the embryonic shield is sufficient for ectopic axis formation, they also raise questions concerning the necessity of the shield region for neural induction and embryonic patterning after the formation of the germ ring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A homeobox gene essential for zebrafish notochord development
Talbot, W. S., Trevarrow, B., Halpern, M. E., Melby, A. E., Farr, G., Postlethwait, J. H., Jowett, T., Kimmel, C. B., & Kimelman, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378150a0 · Cited by 465
Morphogenesis of the murine node and notochordal plate
Sulik, K., Dehart, D. B., Inagaki, T., Carson, J. L., Vrablic, T., Gesteland, K., & Schoenwolf, G. C. (1994) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/aja.1002010309 · Cited by 338
Cited by
FORMATION AND FUNCTION OF SPEMANN'S ORGANIZER
Harland, R., & Gerhart, J. (1997) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.611 · Cited by 839
Structure and function of the notochord: an essential organ for chordate development
Stemple, D. L. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01812 · Cited by 443
Neural induction: toward a unifying mechanism
Wilson, S. I., & Edlund, T. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn747 · Cited by 302
Beddington, R. S. P., & Robertson, E. J. (1998) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(98)01499-1 · Cited by 288
The molecular genetics of holoprosencephaly
Roessler, E., & Muenke, M. (2010) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics · doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30236 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Shih, J., & Fraser, S. E.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1313-1322
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2128817019
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.