The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fibroblast growth factors are necessary for neural retina but not pigmented epithelium differentiation in chick embryos
Abstract
During eye development, optic vesicles evaginate laterally from the neural tube and develop into two bilayered eye cups that are composed of an outer pigment epithelium layer and an inner neural retina layer. Despite their similar embryonic origin, the pigment epithelium and neural retina differentiate into two very distinct tissues. Previous studies have demonstrated that the developmental potential of the pigmented epithelial cells is not completely restricted; until embryonic day 4.5 in chick embryos, the cells are able to switch their phenotype and differentiate into neural retina when treated with fibroblast growth factors (FGF) (Park, C. M., and Hollenberg, M. J. (1989). Dev. Biol. 134, 201-205; Pittack, C., Jones, M., and Reh, T. A. (1991). Development 113, 577-588; Guillemot, F. and Cepko, C. L. (1992). Development 114, 743-754). These studies motivated us to test whether FGF is necessary for neural retina differentiation during the initial stages of eye cup development. Optic vesicles from embryonic day 1.5 chick were cultured for 24 hours as explants in the presence of FGF or neutralizing antibodies to FGF2. The cultured optic vesicles formed eye cups that contained a lens vesicle, neural retina and pigmented epithelium, based on morphology and expression of neural and pigmented epithelium-specific antigens. Addition of FGF to the optic vesicles caused the presumptive pigmented epithelium to undergo neuronal differentiation and, as a consequence, a double retina was formed. By contrast, neutralizing antibodies to FGF2 blocked neural differentiation in the presumptive neural retina, without affecting pigmented epithelial cell differentiation. These data, along with evidence for expression of several FGF family members and their receptors in the developing eye, indicate that members of the FGF family may be required for establishing the distinction between the neural retina and pigmented epithelium in the optic vesicle.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Retinal Stem Cells in the Adult Mammalian Eye
Tropepe, V., Coles, B. L. K., Chiasson, B. J., Horsford, D. J., Elia, A. J., McInnes, R. R., & van der Kooy, D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.2032 · Cited by 1,081
Eye development: a view from the retina pigmented epithelium
Ramón Martínez‐Morales, J., Rodrigo, I., & Bovolenta, P. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20064 · Cited by 271
Bharti, K., Nguyen, M. T., Skuntz, S., Bertuzzi, S., & Arnheiter, H. (2006) · Pigment Cell Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0749.2006.00318.x · Cited by 237
Galy, A., Néron, B., Planque, N., Saule, S., & Eychène, A. (2002) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2002.0736 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittack, C., Grunwald, G. B., & Reh, T. A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-02-15
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 805-816
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2121740884
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fibroblast growth factors are necessary for neural retina but not pigmented epithelium differentiation in chick embryos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.124.4.805
- The paper
- Pittack, C., Grunwald, G. B., & Reh, T. A. (1997). Fibroblast growth factors are necessary for neural retina but not pigmented epithelium differentiation in chick embryos. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.4.805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.