The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preventing the loss of competence for neural induction: HGF/SF, L5 and Sox-2
Abstract
The response to neural induction depends on the presence of inducing signals and on the state of competence of the responding tissue. The epiblast of the chick embryo loses its ability to respond to neural induction by the organizer (Hensen’s node) between stages 4 and 4+. We find that the pattern of expression of the L5220 antigen closely mirrors the changes in competence of the epiblast in time and in space. For the first time, we describe an experiment that can extend the period of neural competence: when L5220 expression is maintained beyond its normal time by implanting HGF/SF secreting cells, the competence to respond to Hensen’s node grafts is retained. The host epiblast forms a non-regionalized neural tube, which expresses the pan-neural marker SOX-2 (a Sry-related transcription factor) but not any region-specific markers for the forebrain, hindbrain or spinal cord. Although HGF/SF secreting cells can mimic signals from Hensen’s node that maintain L5 expression, they cannot rescue the ability of the node to induce anterior structures (which is normally lost after stage 4). The ectoderm may acquire stable neural characteristics during neural induction by going through a hierarchy of states: competence, neuralization and regionalization. Our findings allow us to start to define these different states at a molecular level, and show that the competence to respond to neural induction is not entirely autonomous to the responding cells, but can be regulated by extracellular signalling molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From head to toes: the multiple facets of Sox proteins
Wegner, M. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.6.1409 · Cited by 890
Wood, H. B., & Episkopou, V. (1999) · Mechanisms of Development · doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00116-1 · Cited by 550
Initiation of neural induction by FGF signalling before gastrulation
Streit, A., Berliner, A. J., Papanayotou, C., Sirulnik, A., & Stern, C. D. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35017617 · Cited by 521
Self-citationMizuseki, K., Kishi, M., Matsui, M., Nakanishi, S., & Sasai, Y. (1998) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.125.4.579 · Cited by 462
Neural induction: old problem, new findings, yet more questions
Stern, C. D. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01794 · Cited by 421
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Streit, A., Sockanathan, S., Pérez, L., Rex, M., Scotting, P. J., Sharpe, P. T., Lovell-Badge, R., & Stern, C. D.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-03-15
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1191-1202
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2110894289
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preventing the loss of competence for neural induction: HGF/SF, L5 and Sox-2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.124.6.1191
- The paper
- Streit, A., Sockanathan, S., Pérez, L., Rex, M., Scotting, P. J., Sharpe, P. T., Lovell-Badge, R., & Stern, C. D. (1997). Preventing the loss of competence for neural induction: HGF/SF, L5 and Sox-2. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.6.1191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.