The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo clonal analyses reveal the properties of endogenous neural stem cell proliferation in the adult mammalian forebrain
Abstract
The adult mammalian forebrain contains a population of multipotential neural stem cells in the subependyma of the lateral ventricles whose progeny are the constitutively proliferating cells, which divide actively throughout life. The adult mammalian brain is ideal for examining the kinetics of the stem cells due to their strict spatial localization and the limited and discrete type of progeny generated (constitutively proliferating cells). Clonal lineage analyses 6 days after retrovirus infection revealed that under baseline conditions 60% of the constitutively proliferating cells undergo cell death, 25% migrate to the olfactory bulb and 15% remain confined to the lateral ventricle subependyma (where they reside for approximately 15 days). Analysis of single cell clones 31 days after retroviral infection revealed that the stem cell divides asymmetrically to self-renew and give rise to constitutively proliferating cells. Following repopulation of the depleted subependyma the average clone size is 2.8 times larger than control, yet the absolute number of cells migrating to the olfactory bulb is maintained and the stem cell retains its asymmetric mode of division. The number of neural stem cells in the adult forebrain 33 days after repopulation of the subependyma was estimated using bromodeoxyuridine labeling of subepenydmal cells. There were calculated to be 1200-1300 cells between the rostral corpus callosum and rostral anterior commissure; these data support a lineage model similar to those based on stem cell behavior in other tissue types.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Morshead, C. M., Reynolds, B. A., Craig, C. G., McBurney, M. W., Staines, W. A., Morassutti, D., Weiss, S., & van der Kooy, D. (1994) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(94)90046-9 · Cited by 1,403
Self-citationGrowth and Differentiation in the Hemopoietic System
Dexter, T. M., & Spooncer, E. (1987) · Annual Review of Cell Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.03.110187.002231 · Cited by 209
Cited by
In vivo clonal analysis reveals self-renewing and multipotent adult neural stem cell characteristics
Bonaguidi, M. A., Wheeler, M. A., Shapiro, J. S., Stadel, R. P., Sun, G. J., Ming, G.-L., & Song, H. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.024 · Cited by 831
Wang, J., Gallagher, D., DeVito, L. M., Cancino, G. I., Tsui, D., He, L., Keller, G. M., Frankland, P. W., Kaplan, D. R., & Miller, F. D. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.016 · Cited by 474
Kippin, T. E., Martens, D. J., & van der Kooy, D. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1272305 · Cited by 442
Zhang, R., Zhang, Z., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Robin, A., Wang, Y., Lu, M., & Chopp, M. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1109-04.2004 · Cited by 205
The FGF-2/FGFRs neurotrophic system promotes neurogenesis in the adult brain
Mudò, G., Bonomo, A., Di Liberto, V., Frinchi, M., Fuxe, K., & Belluardo, N. (2009) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-009-0207-z · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Morshead, C. M., Craig, C. G., & Kooy, D. V. D.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1998-06-15
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2251-2261
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2145430337
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo clonal analyses reveal the properties of endogenous neural stem cell proliferation in the adult mammalian forebrain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.125.12.2251
- The paper
- Morshead, C. M., Craig, C. G., & Kooy, D. V. D. (1998). In vivo clonal analyses reveal the properties of endogenous neural stem cell proliferation in the adult mammalian forebrain. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.12.2251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.