The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control of noradrenergic differentiation and Phox2a expression by MASH1 in the central and peripheral nervous system
Abstract
Mash1, a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila proneural genes of the achaete-scute complex, is transiently expressed throughout the developing peripheral autonomic nervous system and in subsets of cells in the neural tube. In the mouse, targeted mutation of Mash1 has revealed a role in the development of parts of the autonomic nervous system and of olfactory neurons, but no discernible phenotype in the brain has been reported. Here, we show that the adrenergic and noradrenergic centres of the brain are missing in Mash1 mutant embryos, whereas most other brainstem nuclei are preserved. Indeed, the present data together with the previous results show that, except in cranial sensory ganglia, Mash1 function is essential for the development of all central and peripheral neurons that express noradrenergic traits transiently or permanently. In particular, we show that, in the absence of MASH1, these neurons fail to initiate expression of the noradrenaline biosynthetic enzyme dopamine β-hydroxylase. We had previously shown that all these neurons normally express the homeodomain transcription factor Phox2a, a positive regulator of the dopamine β-hydroxylase gene and that a subset of them depend on it for their survival. We now report that expression of Phox2a is abolished or massively altered in the Mash1−/−mutants, both in the noradrenergic centres of the brain and in peripheral autonomic ganglia. These results suggest that MASH1 controls noradrenergic differentiation at least in part by controlling expression of Phox2a and point to fundamental homologies in the genetic circuits that determine the noradrenergic phenotype in the central and peripheral nervous system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Locus coeruleus: a new look at the blue spot
Poe, G. R., Foote, S., Eschenko, O., Johansen, J. P., Bouret, S., Aston-Jones, G., Harley, C. W., Manahan-Vaughan, D., Weinshenker, D., Valentino, R., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0360-9 · Cited by 720
Fode, C., Ma, Q., Casarosa, S., Ang, S.-L., Anderson, D. J., & Guillemot, F. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.1.67 · Cited by 624
Self-citationUnderstanding the Rhythm of Breathing: So Near, Yet So Far
Feldman, J. L., Del Negro, C. A., & Gray, P. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-040510-130049 · Cited by 459
Grapin-Botton, A., Majithia, A. R., & Melton, D. A. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.846001 · Cited by 296
Signals and switches in mammalian neural crest cell differentiation
Bhatt, S., Diaz, R., & Trainor, P. A. (2013) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a008326 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirsch, M.-R., Tiveron, M.-C., Guillemot, F., Brunet, J.-F., & Goridis, C.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 599-608
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2161467344
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of noradrenergic differentiation and Phox2a expression by MASH1 in the central and peripheral nervous system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.125.4.599
- The paper
- Hirsch, M.-R., Tiveron, M.-C., Guillemot, F., Brunet, J.-F., & Goridis, C. (1998). Control of noradrenergic differentiation and Phox2a expression by MASH1 in the central and peripheral nervous system. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.125.4.599
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.