The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The developmental basis for allometry in insects
Abstract
Within all species of animals, the size of each organ bears a specific relationship to overall body size. These patterns of organ size relative to total body size are called static allometry and have enchanted biologists for centuries, yet the mechanisms generating these patterns have attracted little experimental study. We review recent and older work on holometabolous insect development that sheds light on these mechanisms. In insects, static allometry can be divided into at least two processes: (1) the autonomous specification of organ identity, perhaps including the approximate size of the organ, and (2) the determination of the final size of organs based on total body size. We present three models to explain the second process: (1) all organs autonomously absorb nutrients and grow at organ-specific rates, (2) a centralized system measures a close correlate of total body size and distributes this information to all organs, and (3) autonomous organ growth is combined with feedback between growing organs to modulate final sizes. We provide evidence supporting models 2 and 3 and also suggest that hormones are the messengers of size information. Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of allometry will come through the integrated study of whole tissues using techniques from development, genetics, endocrinology and population biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Cited by
Brogiolo, W., Stocker, H., Ikeya, T., Rintelen, F., Fernandez, R., & Hafen, E. (2001) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00068-9 · Cited by 1,255
Autonomous Control of Cell and Organ Size by CHICO, a Drosophila Homolog of Vertebrate IRS1–4
Böhni, R., Riesgo-Escovar, J., Oldham, S., Brogiolo, W., Stocker, H., Andruss, B. F., Beckingham, K., & Hafen, E. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80799-0 · Cited by 835
Hormonal pleiotropy and the juvenile hormone regulation ofDrosophila development and life history
Flatt, T., Tu, M.-P., & Tatar, M. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20290 · Cited by 473
How flies get their size: genetics meets physiology
Edgar, B. A. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1989 · Cited by 441
The control of body size in insects
Nijhout, H. F. (2003) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00276-8 · Cited by 384
Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects
Shingleton, A. W., Frankino, W. A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J. (2007) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20584 · Cited by 355
Self-citationAllometric scaling and proportion regulation in the freshwater planarian Schmidtea mediterranea
Oviedo, N. J., Newmark, P. A., & Sánchez Alvarado, A. (2003) · Developmental Dynamics · doi:10.1002/dvdy.10228 · Cited by 169
Sexual size dimorphism in birds
Székely, T., Lislevand, T., & Figuerola, J. (2007) · Sex, Size and Gender Roles · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199208784.003.0004 · Cited by 160
Regulation of Chemosensory Receptor Expression and Sensory Signaling by the KIN-29 Ser/Thr Kinase
Lanjuin, A., & Sengupta, P. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00572-x · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Stern, D. L., & Emlen, D. J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-03-15
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1091-1101
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2167892440
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.