The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The fusome organizes the microtubule network during oocyte differentiation in Drosophila
Abstract
Differentiation of the Drosophila oocyte takes place in a cyst of 16 interconnected germ cells and is dependent on a network of microtubules that becomes polarized as differentiation progresses (polarization). We have investigated how the microtubule network polarizes using a GFP-tubulin construct that allows germ-cell microtubules to be visualized with greater sensitivity than in previous studies. Unexpectedly, microtubules are seen to associate with the fusome, an asymmetric germline-specific organelle, which elaborates as cysts form and undergoes complex changes during cyst polarization. This fusome-microtubule association occurs periodically during late interphases of cyst divisions and then continuously in 16-cell cysts that have entered meiotic prophase. As meiotic cysts move through the germarium, microtubule minus ends progressively focus towards the center of the fusome, as visualized using a NOD-lacZ marker. During this same period, discrete foci rich in γ tubulin that very probably correspond to migrating cystocyte centrosomes also associate with the fusome, first on the fusome arms and then in its center, subsequently moving into the differentiating oocyte. The fusome is required for this complex process, because microtubule network organization and polarization are disrupted in hts1 mutant cysts, which lack fusomes. Our results suggest that the fusome, a specialized membrane-skeletal structure, which arises in early germ cells, plays a crucial role in polarizing 16-cell cysts, at least in part by interacting with microtubules and centrosomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Basto, R., Lau, J., Vinogradova, T., Gardiol, A., Woods, C. G., Khodjakov, A., & Raff, J. W. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.025 · Cited by 686
The Drosophila Cell Corpse Engulfment Receptor Draper Mediates Glial Clearance of Severed Axons
MacDonald, J. M., Beach, M. G., Porpiglia, E., Sheehan, A. E., Watts, R. J., & Freeman, M. R. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.028 · Cited by 523
Visualizing the distribution and transport of mRNAs in living cells
Bratu, D. P., Cha, B.-J., Mhlanga, M. M., Kramer, F. R., & Tyagi, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2233244100 · Cited by 440
Axis formation during Drosophila oogenesis
Riechmann, V., & Ephrussi, A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(00)00207-0 · Cited by 274
Tulin, A., Stewart, D., & Spradling, A. C. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1003902 · Cited by 204
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grieder, N. C., Cuevas, M. D., & Spradling, A. C.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 4253-4264
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2189076266
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.