Edar/Eda interactions regulate enamel knot formation in tooth morphogenesis.
Open accessAbstract
tabby and downless mutant mice have apparently identical defects in teeth, hair and sweat glands. Recently, genes responsible for these spontaneous mutations have been identified. downless (Dl) encodes Edar, a novel member of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, containing the characteristic extracellular cysteine rich fold, a single transmembrane region and a death homology domain close to the C terminus. tabby (Ta) encodes ectodysplasin-A (Eda) a type II membrane protein of the TNF ligand family containing an internal collagen-like domain. As predicted by the similarity in adult mutant phenotype and the structure of the proteins, we demonstrate that Eda and Edar specifically interact in vitro. We have compared the expression pattern of Dl and Ta in mouse development, taking the tooth as our model system, and find that they are not expressed in adjacent cells as would have been expected. Teeth develop by a well recorded series of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, similar to those in hair follicle and sweat gland development, the structures found to be defective in tabby and downless mice. We have analysed the downless mutant teeth in detail, and have traced the defect in cusp morphology back to initial defects in the structure of the tooth enamel knot at E13. Significantly, the defect is distinct from that of the tabby mutant. In the tabby mutant, there is a recognisable but small enamel knot, whereas in the downless mutant the knot is absent, but enamel knot cells are organised into a different shape, the enamel rope, showing altered expression of signalling factors (Shh, Fgf4, Bmp4 and Wnt10b). By adding a soluble form of Edar to tooth germs, we were able to mimic the tabby enamel knot phenotype, demonstrating the involvement of endogenous Eda in tooth development. We could not, however, reproduce the downless phenotype, suggesting the existence of yet another ligand or receptor, or of ligand-independent activation mechanisms for Edar. Changes in the structure of the enamel knot signalling centre in downless tooth germs provide functional data directly linking the enamel knot with tooth cusp morphogenesis. We also show that the Lef1 pathway, thought to be involved in these mutants, functions independently in a parallel path way.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both the expression of Edar and related receptor, Troy, have been detected in the AER of mice.
“both the expression of Edar and related receptor, Troy, have been detected in the AER of mice [40],[41].”
From Zebrafish eda and edar Mutants Reveal Conserved and Ancestral Roles of Ectodysplasin Signaling in Vertebrates (2008) · cites this paper as [41]
The section “Expression of Dl and Ta in tooth development” reports strong expression of Dl (Edar) in the apical ectodermal ridge of a mouse limb at E10; the Fig. 1 caption also identifies AER expression. Our copy does not report Troy expression in the AER, so it supports only the Edar part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Death Receptors: Signaling and Modulation
Ashkenazi, A., & Dixit, V. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1305 · Cited by 5,866 · see citing works
Kere, J., Srivastava, A. K., Montonen, O., Zonana, J., Thomas, N., Ferguson, B., Munoz, F., Morgan, D., Clarke, A., Baybayan, P., et al. (1996) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0895-409 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Srivastava, A. K., Pispa, J., Hartung, A. J., Du, Y., Ezer, S., Jenks, T., Shimada, T., Pekkanen, M., Mikkola, M. L., Ko, M. S. H. et al. (1997). The Tabby phenotype is caused by mutations in a mouse homoloue of the EDA gene that reveals novel mouse and human exons and encodes a proetin (ectodysplasin-A) with collagenous domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13069-13074.
- Wilkinson, D. G. (1995). In situ hybridisation: a practical approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gene defect in ectodermal dysplasia implicates a death domain adapter in development
Headon, D. J., Emmal, S. A., Ferguson, B. M., Tucker, A. S., Justice, M. J., Sharpe, P. T., Zonana, J., & Overbeek, P. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/414913a · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Self-citationDepew, M. J., Tucker, A. S., & Sharpe, P. T. (2002) · Mouse Development · doi:10.1016/b978-012597951-1/50023-8 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Self-citationAn ancient gene network is co-opted for teeth on old and new jaws
Fraser, G. J., Hulsey, C. D., Bloomquist, R. F., Uyesugi, K., Manley, N. R., & Streelman, J. T. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000031 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Harris, M. P., Rohner, N., Schwarz, H., Perathoner, S., Konstantinidis, P., & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000206 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
The EDA/EDAR/NF-κB pathway in non-syndromic tooth agenesis: A genetic perspective
Gao, Y., Jiang, X., Wei, Z., Long, H., & Lai, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1168538 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Overactivation of the NF‐κB pathway impairs molar enamel formation
Yamada, A., Kawasaki, M., Miake, Y., Yamada, Y., Blackburn, J., Kawasaki, K., Trakanant, S., Nagai, T., Nihara, J., Kudo, T., et al. (2020) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.13384 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Tucker, A. S., Headon, D. J., Schneider, P., Ferguson, B. M., Overbeek, P., Tschopp, J., & Sharpe, P. T.
- Affiliations
- Guy's Hospital (GB)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Institute of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne 3 , Ch. des Boveresses 155, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland
- Corresponding author
- Sharpe, Paul T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4691-4700
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2137119500
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- iris.unil.ch
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
- Keywords
- EDAR, EDA, ectodysplasin A, enamel knot, tooth morphogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, Sonic hedgehog, FGF4, BMP4, Wnt10b, LEF1, Wnt signaling, TNF receptor superfamily, hair follicle development, sweat gland development
- MeSH terms
- Amelogenesis, Animals, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Mutant Strains, Morphogenesis, Mutation, Odontogenesis, Organ Culture Techniques, Phenotype, Tooth, Tooth Germ, Apoptosis, Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Mice, Ectodysplasins, Receptors, Ectodysplasin, Edar Receptor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review