Cited by 98Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Combined activities of Gurken and Decapentaplegic specify dorsal chorion structures of the Drosophila egg

Peri, Francesca, Roth, Siegfried·2000·Development

Abstract

During Drosophila oogenesis Gurken, associated with the oocyte nucleus, activates the Drosophila EGF receptor in the follicular epithelium. Gurken first specifies posterior follicle cells, which in turn signal back to the oocyte to induce the migration of the oocyte nucleus from a posterior to an anterior-dorsal position. Here, Gurken signals again to specify dorsal follicle cells, which give rise to dorsal chorion structures including the dorsal appendages. If Gurken signaling is delayed and starts after stage 6 of oogenesis the nucleus remains at the posterior pole of the oocyte. Eggs develop with a posterior ring of dorsal appendage material that is produced by main-body follicle cells expressing the gene Broad-Complex. They encircle terminal follicle cells expressing variable amounts of the TGFbeta homologue, decapentaplegic. By ectopically expressing decapentaplegic and clonal analysis with Mothers against dpp we show that Decapentaplegic signaling is required for Broad-Complex expression. Thus, the specification and positioning of dorsal appendages along the anterior-posterior axis depends on the intersection of both Gurken and Decapentaplegic signaling. This intersection also induces rhomboid expression and thereby initiates the positive feedback loop of EGF receptor activation, which positions the dorsal appendages along the dorsal-ventral egg axis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.127.4.841

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If nuclear movement is prevented, as in mago mutants or when the Grk signal is delayed, eggs develop with a normal AP axis but lack DV polarity orthogonal to the AP axis.

    “If nuclear movement is prevented as in mutants of mago or when the Grk signal is delayed, eggs develop that have a normal AP axis, but lack DV polarity orthogonal to the AP axis (figure 3b; Micklem et al. 1997; Peri & Roth 2000).”

    From The origin of dorsoventral polarity in Drosophila (2003) · cites this paper as Peri & Roth 2000

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 47 · Cited by 98

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Bier, 1990, rhomboid a gene required for dorsoventral axis establishment and peripheral nervous system development in Drosophila melanogaster, Genes Dev, 4, 190, 10.1101/gad.4.2.190 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brand, 1993, Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes, Development, 118, 401, 10.1242/dev.118.2.401 · DOI
  3. Clark, 1994, Transient posterior localization of a kinesin fusion protein reflects anteroposterior polarity of the Drosophila oocyte, Curr. Biol, 4, 289, 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00068-3 · DOI
  4. Das, 1998, The Drosophila gene Medea demostrates the requirement for different classes of Smads in dpp signaling, Development, 125, 1519, 10.1242/dev.125.8.1519 · DOI
  5. Deng, 1997, Two signalling pathways specify localised expression of the Broad-Complex in Drosophila eggshell patterning and morphogenesis, Development, 124, 4639, 10.1242/dev.124.22.4639 · DOI
  6. Dobens, 1997, The Drosophila bunched gene is a homologue of the growth factor stimulated mammalian TSC-22 sequence and is required during oogenesis, Mech. Dev, 65, 197, 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00080-4 · DOI
  7. Ghiglione, 1999, The transmembrane molecule Kekkon 1 acts in a feedback loop to negatively regulate the activity of the Drosophila EGF receptor during oogenesis, Cell, 96, 847, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80594-2 · DOI
  8. González-Reyes, 1995, Polarization of both major body axes in Drosophila by gurken-torpedo signalling, Nature, 375, 654, 10.1038/375654a0 · DOI
  9. González-Reyes, 1994, Role of oocyte position in establishment of anterior-posterior polarity in Drosophila, Science, 266, 639, 10.1126/science.7939717 · DOI
  10. González-Reyes, 1998, Patterning of the follicle cell epithelium along the anterior-posterior axis during Drosophila oogenesis, Development, 125, 2837, 10.1242/dev.125.15.2837 · DOI
  11. Keller Larkin, 1999, Role of the Notch pathway in the terminal follicle cell differentiation during Drosophila oogenesis, Dev. Genes Evol, 99, 301, 10.1007/s004270050256 · DOI
  12. King, 1970, Ovarian development in Drosophila melanogaster
  13. Koch, 1983, Multiple effects of colchicine on oogenesis in Drosophila: induced sterility and switch of potential oocyte to nurse-cell developmental pathway, Cell Tissue Res, 228, 21, 10.1007/BF00206261 · DOI
  14. Lane, 1994, RNA localization along the anteroposterior axis of the Drosophila oocyte requires PKA-mediated signal transduction to direct normal microtubule organization, Genes Dev, 8, 2986, 10.1101/gad.8.24.2986 · DOI
  15. Lee, 1997, Multiple Ras signals pattern the Drosophila ovarian follicle cells, Dev. Biol, 185, 25, 10.1006/dbio.1997.8537 · DOI
  16. Lin, 1993, Germline stem cell division and egg chamber development in transplanted Drosophila germaria, Dev. Biol, 159, 140, 10.1006/dbio.1993.1228 · DOI
  17. Micklem, 1997, The mago nashi gene is required for the polarisation of the oocyte and the formation of perpendicular axes in Drosophila, Curr. Biol, 7, 468, 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00218-1 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Nellen, 1996, Direct and long- range action of a DPP morphogen gradient, Cell, 85, 357, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81114-9 · DOI
  19. Neuman-Silberberg, 1996, The Drosophila TGF- alpha-like protein Gurken: expression and cellular localization during Drosophila oogenesis, Mech. Dev, 59, 105, 10.1016/0925-4773(96)00567-9 · DOI
  20. Neuman-Silberberg, 1993, The Drosophila dorsoventral patterning gene gurken produces a dorsally localized RNA and encodes a TGF-alpha-like protein, Cell, 75, 165, 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80093-5 · DOI
  21. Newmark, 1997, mago nashi mediates the posterior follicle cell-to-oocyte signal to organize axis formation in Drosophila, Development, 124, 3197, 10.1242/dev.124.16.3197 · DOI
  22. Peri, 1999, Local Gurken signaling and dynamic MAPK activation during Drosophila oognesis, Mech. Dev, 81, 75, 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00228-7 · DOI
  23. Pirrotta, 1988, Vectors for P-mediated transformation in Drosophila, 437, 10.1016/B978-0-409-90042-2.50028-3 · DOI
  24. Price, 1989, The maternal ventralizing locus torpedo is allelic to faint little ball, an embryonic lethal, and encodes the Drosophila EGF receptor homolog, Cell, 56, 1085, 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90641-7 · DOI
  25. Queenan, 1997, Ectopic activation of torpedo/Egfr, a Drosophila receptor tyrosine kinase, dorsalizes both the eggshell and the embryo, Development, 124, 3871, 10.1242/dev.124.19.3871 · DOI
  26. Raftery, 1995, Genetic screens to identify elements of the decapentaplegic signaling pathway in Drosophila, Genetics, 139, 241, 10.1093/genetics/139.1.241 · DOI
  27. Roth, 1999, Binulcear Drosophila oocytes: consequences and implications for dorsoventral patterning in oogenesis and embryogenesis, Development, 126, 927, 10.1242/dev.126.5.927 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Roth, 1995, cornichon and the EGF receptor signaling process are necessary for both anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral pattern formation in Drosophila, Cell, 81, 967, 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90016-0 · DOI
  29. Rubin, 1982, Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors, Science, 218, 348, 10.1126/science.6289436 · DOI
  30. Ruohola-Baker, 1993, Spatially localized Rhomboid is required for establishment of the dorsal-ventral axis in Drosophila oogenesis, Cell, 73, 953, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90273-S · DOI
  31. Sapir, 1998, Sequential activation of the EGF receptor pathway during Drosophila oogenesis establishes the dorsoventral axis, Development, 125, 191, 10.1242/dev.125.2.191 · DOI
  32. Saunders, 1999, The role of oocyte transcription, the 5¢UTR, and translation repression and derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and protein localization, Mol. Cell, 3, 43, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2 · DOI
  33. Schejter, 1989, The Drosophila EGF Receptor Homolog (DER) gene is allelic to faint little ball, a locus essential for embryonic development, Cell, 56, 1093, 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90642-9 · DOI
  34. Schüpbach, 1987, Germ line and soma cooperate during oogenesis to establish the dorsoventral pattern of egg shell and embryo in Drosophila melanogaster, Cell, 49, 699, 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90546-0 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sekelsky, 1995, Genetic characterization and cloning of Mothers against dpp, a gene required for decapentaplegic function in Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 139, 1347, 10.1093/genetics/139.3.1347 · DOI
  36. Sen, 1998, Spatially restricted expression of pipe in the Drosophila egg chamber defines embryonic dorsal- ventral polarity, Cell, 95, 471, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81615-3 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Spradling, 1993, Developmental genetics of oogenesis, 1
  38. St Johnston, 1987, decapentaplegic transcripts are localized along the dorsal-ventral axis of the Drosophila embryo, EMBO J, 6, 2785, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02574.x · DOI
  39. Tautz, 1989, A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback, Chromosoma, 98, 81, 10.1007/BF00291041 · DOI
  40. Theurkauf, 1993, A central role of microtuble in the differentiation of Drosophila oocyte, Development, 118, 1169, 10.1242/dev.118.4.1169 · DOI
  41. Theurkauf, 1992, Reorganization of the cytoskeleton during Drosophila oogenesis implications for axis specification and intercellular transport, Development, 115, 923, 10.1242/dev.115.4.923 · DOI
  42. Twombly, 1996, The TGF-b signaling pathway is essential for Drosophila oogenesis, Development, 122, 1555, 10.1242/dev.122.5.1555 · DOI
  43. Wasserman, 1998, An autoregulatory cascade of EGF receptor signaling patterns the Drosophila egg, Cell, 95, 355, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81767-5 · DOI
  44. Xu, 1993, Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues, Development, 117, 1223, 10.1242/dev.117.4.1223 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Peri, F., & Roth, S.
Affiliations
University of Cologne (DE)
Corresponding author
Roth, Siegfried
Venue
Development
Published
2000-02-15
Volume
127
Issue
4
Pages
841-850
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2171483658
Cited by
98
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Keywords
Gurken, decapentaplegic, dorsal appendage, Drosophila oogenesis, EGF receptor signaling, follicle cells, Broad-Complex, TGF-beta signaling, rhomboid, anterior-posterior axis, dorsal-ventral axis
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Female, Mosaicism, Oocytes, Oogenesis, Phenotype, Transforming Growth Factors, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor alpha, Cell Polarity, Genes, Insect, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Insect Proteins, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review