Cited by 151

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Roles of Hoxa1 and Hoxa2 in patterning the early hindbrain of the mouse

Barrow, Jeffery R., Stadler, H. Scott, Capecchi, Mario R.·2000·Development

Abstract

Early in its development, the vertebrate hindbrain is transiently subdivided into a series of compartments called rhombomeres. Genes have been identified whose expression patterns distinguish these cellular compartments. Two of these genes, Hoxa1 and Hoxa2, have been shown to be required for proper patterning of the early mouse hindbrain and the associated neural crest. To determine the extent to which these two genes function together to pattern the hindbrain, we generated mice simultaneously mutant at both loci. The hindbrain patterning defects were analyzed in embryos individually mutant for Hoxa1 and Hoxa2 in greater detail and extended to embryos mutant for both genes. From these data a model is proposed to describe how Hoxa1, Hoxa2, Hoxb1, Krox20 (Egr2) and kreisler function together to pattern the early mouse hindbrain. Critical to the model is the demonstration that Hoxa1 activity is required to set the anterior limit of Hoxb1 expression at the presumptive r3/4 rhombomere boundary. Failure to express Hoxb1 to this boundary in Hoxa1 mutant embryos initiates a cascade of gene misexpressions that result in misspecification of the hindbrain compartments from r2 through r5. Subsequent to misspecification of the hindbrain compartments, ectopic induction of apoptosis appears to be used to regulate the aberrant size of the misspecified rhombomeres.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.127.5.933

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Albano, 1994, Expression of inhibin subunits and follistatin during postimplantation mouse development: decidual expression of activin and expession of folistatin in primitive streak, somites and hindbrain, Development, 120, 803, 10.1242/dev.120.4.803 · DOI
  2. Barrow, 1996, Targeted disruption of the hoxb-2 locus in mice interferes with expression of hoxb-1 and hoxb-4, Development, 122, 3817, 10.1242/dev.122.12.3817 · DOI
  3. Barrow, 1999, Compensatory defects associated with mutations in Hoxa1 restore normal palatogenesis to Hoxa2 mutants, Development, 126, 5011, 10.1242/dev.126.22.5011 · DOI
  4. Carpenter, 1993, Loss of Hox-A1 (Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain, Development, 118, 1063, 10.1242/dev.118.4.1063 · DOI
  5. Chisaka, 1992, Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.6, Nature, 355, 516, 10.1038/355516a0 · DOI
  6. Fraser, 1990, Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions, Nature, 344, 431, 10.1038/344431a0 · DOI
  7. Frohman, 1990, Isolation of the mouse Hox-2.9 gene; analysis of embryonic expression suggests that positional information along the anterior-posterior axis is specified by mesoderm, Development, 110, 589, 10.1242/dev.110.2.589 · DOI
  8. Frohman, 1993, Altered rhombomere-specific gene expression and hyoid bone differentiation in the mouse segmentation mutant, kreisler (kr), Development, 117, 925, 10.1242/dev.117.3.925 · DOI
  9. Gavalas, 1997, Control of axon guidance and rostral hindbrain patterning by Hoxa2, Development, 124, 3693, 10.1242/dev.124.19.3693 · DOI
  10. Gavalas, 1998, Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch, Development, 125, 1123, 10.1242/dev.125.6.1123 · DOI
  11. Gendron-Maguire, 1993, Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest, Cell, 75, 1317, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90619-2 · DOI
  12. Gilardi-Hebenstreit, 1992, An Eph-related receptor protein tyrosine kinase gene segmentally expressed in the developing mouse hindbrain, Oncogene, 7, 2499
  13. Goddard, 1996, Mice with targeted disruption of Hoxb-1 fail to form the motor nucleus of the VIIth nerve, Development, 122, 3217, 10.1242/dev.122.10.3217 · DOI
  14. Godwin, 1998, Detection of targeted, GFP-Hox gene fusions during mouse embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 13042, 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13042 · DOI
  15. Graham, 1996, Interactions between rhombomeres modulate Krox20 and follistatin expression in the chick embryo hindbrain, Development, 122, 473, 10.1242/dev.122.2.473 · DOI
  16. Helmbacher, 1998, Hoxa1 and Krox20 synergize to control the development of rhombomere 3, Development, 125, 4739, 10.1242/dev.125.23.4739 · DOI
  17. Hunt, 1991, A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head, Nature, 353, 861, 10.1038/353861a0 · DOI
  18. Hunt, 1991, The branchial Hox code and its implications for gene regulation, patterning of the nervous system and head evolution, Development, 2, 63, 10.1242/dev.113.Supplement_2.63 · DOI
  19. Irving, 1996, Progressive spatial restriction of Sek-1 and Krox20 gene expression during hindbrain segmentation, Dev. Biol, 173, 26, 10.1006/dbio.1996.0004 · DOI
  20. Köntges, 1996, Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny, Development, 122, 3229, 10.1242/dev.122.10.3229 · DOI
  21. Lufkin, 1991, Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression, Cell, 66, 1105, 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90034-V · DOI
  22. Lumsden, 1989, Segmental patterns of neuronal development in the chick hindbrain, Nature, 337, 424, 10.1038/337424a0 · DOI
  23. Manley, 1995, The role of hoxa-3 in mouse thymus and thyroid development, Development, 121, 1989, 10.1242/dev.121.7.1989 · DOI
  24. Mark, 1993, Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice, Development, 119, 319, 10.1242/dev.119.2.319 · DOI
  25. McGinnis, 1992, Homeobox genes and axial patterning, Cell, 68, 283, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90471-N · DOI · Paper page
  26. McKay, 1994, The kreisler mouse: a hindbrain segmentation mutant that lacks two rhombomeres, Development, 121, 2199, 10.1242/dev.120.8.2199 · DOI
  27. Meyer, 1997, Isoform-specific expression and function of neuregulin, Development, 124, 3575, 10.1242/dev.124.18.3575 · DOI
  28. Murphy, 1991, Expression of the mouse labial-like homeobox-containing genes, Hox-2.9 and Hox-1.6, during segmentation of the hindbrain, Development, 111, 61, 10.1242/dev.111.1.61 · DOI
  29. Nonchev, 1996, Segmental expression of Hoxa-2 in the hindbrain is directly regulated by Krox 20, Development, 122, 543, 10.1242/dev.122.2.543 · DOI
  30. Pöpperl, 1995, Segmental expression of Hoxb-1 is controlled by a highly conserved autoregulatory loop dependent upon exd/pbx, Cell, 81, 1031, 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80008-X · DOI
  31. Rijli, 1993, A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene, Cell, 75, 1333, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90620-6 · DOI
  32. Rossel, 1999, Mice mutant for both Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 show extensive remodeling of the hindbrain and defects in craniofacial development, Development, 126, 5027, 10.1242/dev.126.22.5027 · DOI
  33. Schneider-Maunoury, 1993, Disruption of Krox20 results in alteration of rhombomeres 3 and 5 in the developing hindbrain, Cell, 75, 1199, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90329-O · DOI
  34. Schwenk, 1995, A cre-transgenic mouse strain for the ubiquitous deletion of loxP-flanked gene segments including deletion in germ cells, Nucleic Acids Res, 23, 5080, 10.1093/nar/23.24.5080 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Seitanidou, 1997, Krox20 is a key regulator of rhombomere-specific gene expression in the developing hindbrain. Mech. Dev, 65, 31
  36. Sham, 1993, The zinc finger gene Krox20 regulates HoxB2 (Hox2.8) during hindbrain segmentation, Cell, 72, 183, 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90659-E · DOI
  37. Studer, 1998, Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning, Development, 125, 1025, 10.1242/dev.125.6.1025 · DOI
  38. Studer, 1996, Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb-1, Nature, 384, 630, 10.1038/384630a0 · DOI
  39. Trainor, 1995, Cranial paraxial mesoderm and neural crest cells of the mouse embryo: co-distribution in the craniofacial mesenchyme but distinct segregation in branchial arches, Development, 121, 2569, 10.1242/dev.121.8.2569 · DOI
  40. Wilkinson, 1989, Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse, Nature, 337, 461, 10.1038/337461a0 · DOI
  41. Zhang, 1994, Ectopic Hoxa-1 induces rhombomere transformation in the mouse hindbrain, Development, 120, 2431, 10.1242/dev.120.9.2431 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 151

Metadata

Authors
Barrow, J. R., Stadler, H. S., & Capecchi, M. R.
Affiliations
University of Utah School of Medicine Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Human Genetics , , Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Venue
Development
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
127
Issue
5
Pages
933-944
ISSN
  • 0950-1991
  • 1477-9129
Cited by
151
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review