The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons
Abstract
Insect dendritic arborization (da) neurons provide an opportunity to examine how diverse dendrite morphologies and dendritic territories are established during development. We have examined the morphologies of Drosophila da neurons by using the MARCM (mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker) system. We show that each of the 15 neurons per abdominal hemisegment spread dendrites to characteristic regions of the epidermis. We place these neurons into four distinct morphological classes distinguished primarily by their dendrite branching complexities. Some class assignments correlate with known proneural gene requirements as well as with central axonal projections. Our data indicate that cells within two morphological classes partition the body wall into distinct, non-overlapping territorial domains and thus are organized as separate tiled sensory systems. The dendritic domains of cells in different classes, by contrast, can overlap extensively. We have examined the cell-autonomous roles of starry night (stan) (also known as flamingo (fmi)) and sequoia (seq) in tiling. Neurons with these genes mutated generally terminate their dendritic fields at normal locations at the lateral margin and segment border, where they meet or approach the like dendrites of adjacent neurons. However, stan mutant neurons occasionally send sparsely branched processes beyond these territories that could potentially mix with adjacent like dendrites. Together, our data suggest that widespread tiling of the larval body wall involves interactions between growing dendritic processes and as yet unidentified signals that allow avoidance by like dendrites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychedelics promote structural and functional neural plasticity
Ly, C., Greb, A. C., Cameron, L. P., Wong, J. M., Barragan, E. V., Wilson, P. C., Burbach, K. F., Soltanzadeh Zarandi, S., Sood, A., Paddy, M. R., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.022 · Cited by 1,207
Parallel processing strategies of the primate visual system
Nassi, J. J., & Callaway, E. M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2619 · Cited by 802
Nern, A., Pfeiffer, B. D., & Rubin, G. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1506763112 · Cited by 584
Branching out: mechanisms of dendritic arborization
Jan, Y.-N., & Jan, L. Y. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2836 · Cited by 693
Self-citationA multilevel multimodal circuit enhances action selection in drosophila
Ohyama, T., Schneider-Mizell, C. M., Fetter, R. D., Aleman, J. V., Franconville, R., Rivera-Alba, M., Mensh, B. D., Branson, K. M., Simpson, J. H., Truman, J. W., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14297 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Grueber, W. B., Jan, L. Y., & Jan, Y. N.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-06-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2867-2878
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2099607192
- Cited by
- 582
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.129.12.2867
- The paper
- Grueber, W. B., Jan, L. Y., & Jan, Y. N. (2002). Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.12.2867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.