The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells
Abstract
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism that causes functional differences between paternal and maternal genomes, and plays an essential role in mammalian development. Stage-specific changes in the DNA methylation patterns of imprinted genes suggest that their imprints are erased some time during the primordial germ cell (PGC) stage, before their gametic patterns are re-established during gametogenesis according to the sex of individuals. To define the exact timing and pattern of the erasure process, we have analyzed parental-origin-specific expression of imprinted genes and DNA methylation patterns of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in embryos, each derived from a single day 11.5 to day 13.5 PGC by nuclear transfer. Cloned embryos produced from day 12.5 to day 13.5 PGCs showed growth retardation and early embryonic lethality around day 9.5. Imprinted genes lost their parental-origin-specific expression patterns completely and became biallelic or silenced. We confirmed that clones derived from both male and female PGCs gave the same result, demonstrating the existence of a common default state of genomic imprinting to male and female germlines. When we produced clone embryos from day 11.5 PGCs, their development was significantly improved, allowing them to survive until at least the day 11.5 embryonic stage. Interestingly, several intermediate states of genomic imprinting between somatic cell states and the default states were seen in these embryos. Loss of the monoallelic expression of imprinted genes proceeded in a step-wise manner coordinated specifically for each imprinted gene. DNA demethylation of the DMRs of the imprinted genes in exact accordance with the loss of their imprinted monoallelic expression was also observed. Analysis of DNA methylation in day 10.5 to day 12.5 PGCs demonstrated that PGC clones represented the DNA methylation status of donor PGCs well. These findings provide strong evidence that the erasure process of genomic imprinting memory proceeds in the day 10.5 to day 11.5 PGCs, with the timing precisely controlled for each imprinted gene. The nuclear transfer technique enabled us to analyze the imprinting status of each PGC and clearly demonstrated a close relationship between expression and DNA methylation patterns and the ability of imprinted genes to support development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality
Li, E., Bestor, T. H., & Jaenisch, R. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-f · Cited by 3,984
Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene
Bell, A. C., & Felsenfeld, G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35013100 · Cited by 1,746
De novo DNA cytosine methyltransferase activities in mouse embryonic stem cells
Lei, H., Oh, S. P., Okano, M., Jüttermann, R., Goss, K. A., Jaenisch, R., & Li, E. (1996) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.122.10.3195 · Cited by 816
Cited by
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development
Reik, W. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05918 · Cited by 1,963
Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development
Li, E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg887 · Cited by 1,900
Reconstitution of the Mouse Germ Cell Specification Pathway in Culture by Pluripotent Stem Cells
Hayashi, K., Ohta, H., Kurimoto, K., Aramaki, S., & Saitou, M. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.052 · Cited by 1,379
The Dynamics of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells
Seisenberger, S., Andrews, S., Krueger, F., Arand, J., Walter, J., Santos, F., Popp, C., Thienpont, B., Dean, W., & Reik, W. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001 · Cited by 973
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J., Inoue, K., Ono, R., Ogonuki, N., Kohda, T., Kaneko-Ishino, T., Ogura, A., & Ishino, F.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-04-15
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1807-1817
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1892165070
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.129.8.1807
- The paper
- Lee, J., Inoue, K., Ono, R., Ogonuki, N., Kohda, T., Kaneko-Ishino, T., Ogura, A., & Ishino, F. (2002). Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.129.8.1807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.