The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Control of events during early cleavage of the mouse embryo: an analysis of the ‘2-cell block’
Abstract
Embryos from certain strains of mice do not develop into blastocysts when cultured in vitro from the 1- or 2-cell stages but arrest development as 2-cell embryos - a phenomenon referred toas the ‘2-cell block’. Reciprocal crosses between eggs and sperm of a ‘blocking’ (CFLP) and ‘non-blocking’ (F1) strain show that in this combination the genotype of the egg alone determines whether the embryo ‘blocks’ at the 2-cell stage (or continues retarded development to the 4-to 6-cell stage in a minority of cases). A comparison of molecular and cellular development in normal and ‘blocked 2-cell’ embryos was therefore undertaken to investigate the influence of these maternal components on early mouse development. The results show that the majority of ‘blocked 2-cells’ arrest development at a stage equivalent to the late 2-cell stage in terms of cellular and nuclear division, DNA synthesis, activation of the embryonic genome, qualitative and quantitative changes in amino acid uptake, polypeptide synthesis and morphological maturation of organelles. These observations are compatible with the notion that maternally inherited developmental information plays an important role in controlling early cleavage of the mouse embryo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro
Chatot, C. L., Ziomek, C. A., Bavister, B. D., Lewis, J. L., & Torres, I. (1989) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/jrf.0.0860679 · Cited by 1,114
Khosla, S., Dean, W., Brown, D., Reik, W., & Feil, R. (2001) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod64.3.918 · Cited by 559
Johnson, M. H., & Nasresfahani, M. H. (1994) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.950160105 · Cited by 342
Development of 1-Cell Embryos from Different Strains of Mice in CZB Medium1
Chatot, C. L., Lewis, J. L., Torres, I., & Ziomek, C. A. (1990) · Biology of Reproduction · doi:10.1095/biolreprod42.3.432 · Cited by 271
Janny, L., & Menezo, Y. J. R. (1994) · Molecular Reproduction and Development · doi:10.1002/mrd.1080380107 · Cited by 267
Involvement of superoxide radicals in the mouse two‐cell block
Noda, Y., Matsumoto, H., Umaoka, Y., Tatsumi, K., Kishi, J., & Mori, T. (1991) · Molecular Reproduction and Development · doi:10.1002/mrd.1080280408 · Cited by 260
Aging and the environment affect gamete and embryo potential: can we intervene?
Meldrum, D. R., Casper, R. F., Diez-Juan, A., Simon, C., Domar, A. D., & Frydman, R. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.013 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Goddard, M. J., & Pratt, H. P. M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1983-02-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-133
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2164359007
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.